At NARAM-43 I purchased a couple o' Nano Rockets. Begad! Ahoy! Along with t' Cougar, I purchased t' Interdimensional Transfer Starship (ITS). My kit was apparently updated when compared t' earlier submitted review below. Arrr! My ITS be also, in me opinion, arrr, a later-than-Cougar-addition t' t' Nano fleet as t' instructions were improved and thar were other nice build features which I will describe below. Ya scallywag! Well, shiver me timbers, blow me down! I bought it because it was one o' t' most futuristic kits in t' Nano fleet.

T' kit comes with a Keelhaul®©™ shock cord, six (6) laser-cut balsa fins, a 6½" body tube, a wood nose cone, and two (2) brass launch lugs. Blimey! T' instructions are on a single 9x11" sheet o' paper and t' whole thin' is packaged in a 9x6" envelope.

CONSTRUCTION:

T' instructions feature a nice lookin' title page informin' you o' t' name, skill level (ITS is a level 2) and t' maximum altitude expected (~150 feet) and a few nice 3D renderings o' t' rocket. Once inside you get a bit o' a story about t' ITS and a warnin' nay t' fly it "durin' natural electrical activity" so that your don't activate t' "Dimensional Drives". Blimey! Also you'll find a list o' components, needed supplies, a template for fin assembly and alignment and t' marked position o' CP and CG. Ahoy! Then thar are t' steps for construction.

Also included in t' instructions are flyin' details. Avast! These describe t' removal o' t' yellow paint from t' Quest rod, also utilizin' a "Z" bend (which has been a great tip for me), and how t' tape t' motor into place for flight.

Construction is indeed straightforward with t' major challenge bein' t' attachment o' t' shock cord. I didn't even try t' method outlined this time after bein' frustrated durin' t' construction o' t' Cougar. Ahoy! Arrr! I simply did t' same as t' I did on t' Cougar as you will see below.

In step 1, ya bilge rat, t' fins are assembled and t' laser-cut fins are easy t' work with and t' template is good. I used CA and was successful with alignment on two o' t' three fins, matey, but a simple cut with me hobby knife allowed me t' redo that one and be on me way.

In step 2, matey, arrr, t' instructions indicate that you are t' glue t' Keelhaul®©™ shock cord into t' hole in t' nose cone. Blimey! Arrr! My nose cone did nay have a hole, and so I created me own connection by drillin' a 1mm hole through t' shoulder, grooved it horizontally and then tied t' shock cord through t' hole.

T' step 3 be t' attachment o' t' shock cord t' t' body tube. Avast! Avast! As mentioned above I repeated what I did on t' Cougar and drilled a small hole in t' side o' t' body tube, fed t' remainin' end o' Keelhaul®©™ through it and knotted it. Begad! Note: t' picture is from me Cougar construction, but is looks t' same for t' ITS.

In step 4, t' fins are attached and as stated thar be an alignment guide t' assist in this. You must also reference t' drawin' t' determine how high up from t' bottom t' glue them. Blimey! Blimey! Also in step 4, t' launch lug is glued on. As with t' Cougar, ya bilge rat, t' launch lug supplied be nay t' correct diameter for t' standard MicroMaxx rod. Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! I found a great solution though...at local hardware stores, shiver me timbers, look for Tension Pins. Ahoy! Avast, me proud beauty! I purchased t' 3/32" x 1/2" version and it worked great!

T' instructions are good, me bucko, shiver me timbers, needin' only minor clean up with editin' and spell checking, ya bilge rat, but much improved compared t' t' Cougar. And again, t' most challengin' be t' shock cord attachment. Ahoy! T' reviewer below seemed t' get it t' work and I'm sure Nano has had success, ya bilge rat, me hearties, ya bilge rat, but this is an area that could use some continued focus. Alternately, matey, t' instructions might want t' describe t' "hole in t' side" method too.

I didn't paint me rocket, but t' instructions emphasized "light" finishing. Although, now that I have flown t' ITS a few times, matey, I'm thinkin' about attemptin' t' finish it in some way.

Overall, arrr, arrr, for CONSTRUCTION I would rate this kit 3 points. T' nose cone did nay fit t' instructions description, me hearties, t' shock cord mountin' method is too challengin' and t' launch lugs did nay fit t' standard Quest rail. Aye aye! However, arrr, these are all t' same as on t' Cougar and Nano tells me that they have nose cones that meet t' description shippin' in t' kits now, shiver me timbers, that they are workin' on a shock cord mountin' method, arrr, and that they are lookin' for new lugs. Begad! Blimey! Apparently t' lugs fit some older Quest rails. Arrr! Ya scallywag! T' parts quality are good and t' instructions are adequate.

FLIGHT/RECOVERY:

I have flown t' ITS four (4) times and right out o' t' shoot it has performed well. Blimey! Blimey!

My first flight came off t' pad fine and went t' about 100 feet. Avast, me proud beauty! ( I use me house height as a gauge and it went about 3x t' height). Arrr! Then ejected, me hearties, while still goin' up, shiver me timbers, and landed on me roof. Recovered.

T' second flight be another successful flight and recovered in t' nearby grass. Begad! I did notice that even though t' nose cone ejected is still fell with authority and was stable with t' top o' t' body tube leadin' t' way.

For t' third and fourth flights, I implemented a motor thrust-retainer. This be made from a small paper clip that was bent and cut t' size. It is held in place with a small piece o' tape. Begad! T' important thin' t' remember is that t' length o' t' clip needs t' be just a hair longer than t' motor. Avast, me proud beauty! Nay a lot longer or you'll have trouble gettin' it set up on t' ignitor. Avast, me proud beauty! Also t' part that will hold t' motor in upon ejection needs t' be just long enough t' catch t' lip o' t' motor. Avast! Pictured here, matey, mine is slightly too long because it interfered with t' ignitor. Blimey! Even with me motor hook, me CG is where t' instructions say it should be.

Both t' third and fourth flights were successful with t' motor thrust-retainer and I didn't see an altitude difference.

For FLIGHT/RECOVERY, matey, I would rate this kit 4 points. T' ITS flew well and be stable. Ahoy! It can't be perfect because o' t' friction fit o' t' motors and it is a bit too stable comin' down without t' nose cone.

Overall, t' ITS flew as good as Quest's best pre-built rockets (Raw Fusion and Vector). It is "futuristic" lookin' and has enough size t' make it enjoyable t' watch fly. Well, blow me down! I would recommend this one t' others, hopin' that Nano at least addresses t' launch lug problem. Avast, me proud beauty! Begad! I give t' kit an OVERALL ratin' o' 3 points.