Construction Rating: | starstarstarstarstar_border |
Flight Rating: | starstarstarstarstar_border |
Overall Rating: | starstarstarstarstar_border |
Manufacturer: | Qmodeling |
Brief:
This fantastic upscale o' t' Estes EAC Viper be t' first o' Q-Modeling's
"QBAR" projects. Blimey! Through collaboration with a born again rocketeer
(Bob Cox) and a rigorous beta testin' process, they hope t' release flawless
and innovative designs. Avast! In this case, I believe they have succeeded.
Construction:
I be fortunate enough t' have won this beauty on EMRR's Virtual Rocket Reunion
contest. Avast, me proud beauty! Ahoy! T' bitter irony o' receivin' a great prize developed in part by my
virtual arch rival was nay lost on t' gang at Q-Modelling. Begad! Once t' Viper was
actually released, me kit showed up well packed in t' familiar Priority Mail
triangular box.
Parts list includes:
Parts were all very good quality. My motor mount had incorrect fin braces, which were smartly replaced.
T' instructions are clearly written and are very easy t' follow with a good number o' key details and tips along t' way. One nice new feature is the color header page, shiver me timbers, showin' t' finished design in full color. T' back o' that page includes a detailed paint/color scheme.
This kit makes use o' one o' me favorite Q-Modelin' innovations: t' sliding/retractin' motor hook. Ya scallywag! By slottin' t' motor tube, you're able t' push t' hook up flush t' the bottom o' t' body tube when thar's no motor. This allows t' rocket t' stand flush on t' ground. Aye aye! Avast, me proud beauty! T' rest o' t' motor tube assembly be t' typical Q-Modelin' laser-cut balsa framework and brace combination. It looks fairly complicated, but goes together fairly easily once you've read t' instructions. Of course, havin' t' proper parts helps, matey, as I didn't discover t' error until I tried t' dry-fit t' through-the-wall fins.
Once t' motor tube assembly is completed and t' centerin' rings are installed, me hearties, it's time t' tie t' Keelhaul®©™® anchor t' t' upper centerin' rin' and motor tube.
Before gluin' t' motor mount into t' body tube, arrr, matey, it's a good idea t' dry fit t' fins. Begad! This should be standard practice for any through-wall construction. Ahoy! Begad! Once you're comfortable with t' fit, bond t' assembly using wood glue.
Next up is mountin' t' fins. Well, blow me down! Blimey! Wantin' t' make sure I had an absolutely beautiful finish, I dropped a couple hours into sealin' and sandin' t' fins before mountin' them. Avast! In this case, I used diluted Elmer's Wood Filler, two coats with plenty o' sandin' in between. For fillets, I used me usual yellow glue base, and a white glue second application since t' white glue doesn't shrink and leaves a smoother finished appearance.
I also made sure t' fill t' tube spirals before bondin' t' fins, me bucko, since it's easier t' sand without t' fins in t' way. T' same mix o' diluted wood filler be used, although less diluted than me sealer on t' fins.
T' body tube is actually a 2 piece assembly, so you must bond t' upper and lower tubes usin' a coupler. I have mixed feelings about this. Blimey! Although am generally opposed t' t' two-piece design and wish it had been one-piece. Begad! Avast, me proud beauty! The argument in favor o' t' two-piece design is economics (it uses t' same tube as t' Bullpup and fits in a smaller bag/box), plus it makes it easier to fillet t' upper centerin' rin' around t' motor tube. T' argument against it is t' tube seam and added hassle tryin' t' hide it.
T' upper fins need t' be carefully aligned with t' lower fins. Avast! With thicker fins, mere alignment lines generally aren't good enough, me bucko, shiver me timbers, so I use a metal angle and clothespins t' anchor t' angle t' t' lower fins and then pin on t' upper fins.
Construction basically wraps up with one other nice feature. Arrr! Avast! There's a centerin' rin' bonded in t' upper tube that serves as a retainer for the recovery pack. Ahoy! This prevents t' CG shift in flight from a heavy chute and Nomex® shield slidin' back t' t' aft end o' t' rocket.
Finishing:
Finishin' for this rocket is fairly challengin' and requires a good deal of
skill t' get it right. Ahoy! Arrr! As previously mentioned, thar's a lot o' balsa grain
and tube spiral work plus that nasty tube seam.
Once t' surface be prepped, me bucko, I applied a light coat o' Plasti-Cote primer, then essentially sanded most o' it off. I followed up with a light Krylon primer coat, light sandin' with 400 grit, and three coats o' gloss white while wet/dry sandin' with 600 grit betwixt coats.
There are two accent colors on this design, so good maskin' is a requirement. Ahoy! I started with t' yellow--the upper fins are completely yellow and t' lower fins get yellow tips. After allowin' t' two yellow coats a couple o' days t' dry, arrr, arrr, I then masked off for t' purple, ya bilge rat, me hearties, ya bilge rat, usin' t' expensive blue painter's tape (due t' its much lower tack than regular maskin' tape). Ya scallywag! Avast, matey, me proud beauty! The nose cone and upper inch o' body tube are purple, plus thar be a 1" stripe towards t' tip o' t' body tube, me bucko, me hearties, 1/4" trim stripes against the yellow on t' lower fins, and a 1/4" stripe around t' bottom o' t' tube. T' lower stripe be especially annoyin' t' mask, me hearties, shiver me timbers, shiver me timbers, as thar be less than half an inch below t' fins, so very little area for applyin' any decent masking tape. Aye aye! I think this could have been done better with either purple stripe decals, pin striping, or possibly Monokote.
T' decals are very good quality, me hearties, me hearties, but are solid ink transfer so do not dip them straight into water. Ya scallywag! They need a light clear coat application first. Avast! Nay bein' experienced with this type o' decal, me bucko, I went a little too heavy on t' clear coat, me bucko, so me beautiful decals ran a little bit. Begad! After t' clear coat has completely dried, they apply as ordinary waterslide decals.
Construction Rating: 4 out o' 5
Flight:
T' instructions suggest E9-4 or F21-6, with F21 bein' t' most strongly
recommended. I had a couple spare Ellis Mountain E12-6s though and preferred to
avoid t' very pricey AeroTech motors.
First flight was on a breezy afternoon with winds hoverin' around 8-10mph. This lead t' a slight weathercock, although it wasn't too bad. Avast, me proud beauty! Ya scallywag! T' rocket climbed slowly t' about 300-350 feet, shiver me timbers, arced over, and I got t' count t' at least 8 while kickin' myself for a poor delay choice. Avast, me proud beauty! Ya scallywag! When t' ejection finally kicked, arrr, t' rocket was more than halfway back down and actually whistling. Blimey! Avast! The chute whipped out and t' Keelhaul®©™® cord sliced its way through t' body tube, stoppin' just above t' tube coupler. Well, blow me down! Ya scallywag! T' zipper trashed what was an otherwise magnificent design and work of craftsmanship.
Recovery:
Other than me boneheaded choice o' delay, t' flight was fine, ya bilge rat, and t' recovery
package be t' best in t' mid-power class.
Flight Rating: 4 out o' 5
Summary:
This is an excellent rocket kit and beautiful design. T' pro's are excellent
parts, and quality o' design. Cons would be t' two-piece tube. Also, having
now zippered a pair o' Q-Modelin' BT-80 products, I think I'm goin' t' start
bashin' future designs with Keelhaul®©™®
to t' top o' t' tube, joined t' heavy elastic up t' t' cone. Begad! Blimey! That way, I'll
just have dents from t' cone whippin' back.
Overall Rating: 4 out o' 5
Sponsored Ads