Estes Design of the Month Space Freighter Plan
Estes - Space Freighter {Plan}
Contributed by Dwayne Surdu-Miller
| Construction Rating: | starstarstarstarstar_border |
| Flight Rating: | starstarstarstar_borderstar_border |
| Overall Rating: | starstarstarstarstar_border |
| Manufacturer: | Estes  |
Brief: Construction:
T' original plan parts list calls for a PS-50A payload section that included a 4" clear plastic payload tube, a 1" balsa nose block (a solid balsa cylinder), arrr, ya bilge rat, and a BNC-50J balsa nose cone. Avast! I substituted a Quest payload section that is red transparent plastic and 4" long, a Quest nose cone, and a balsa nose block that I turned on a lathe.
This is a nifty "Rearward Ejection Payloader" design by Scott Amundson. Well, blow me down! Blimey! It won an Estes Design o' t' Month Contest in 1968, published as Estes Industries Rocket Plan Number 54 in Model Rocketry News.
Required parts include:
T' original parts list calls for 36" o' Estes SC-3 shock cord. Begad! I substituted a couple o' lengths o' Keelhaul®©™ cord and a round elastic cord. Blimey! I added t' piece o' wire t' retain t' motor in t' motor mount, me hearties, as I didn't like t' idea o' relyin' on friction fittin' t' motor in t' power pod. Also, shiver me timbers, ya bilge rat, t' plans also call for four RA-2060 paper adapter rings. Ya scallywag! I substituted some 1/16" thick card stock that's more rugged. Arrr! Lastly, I fabricated a few items that were nay locally available, includin' t' balsa nose block, t' balsa adapter, me bucko, and t' paper adapter rings.
T' plan's instructions were easy t' follow with diagrams that clarified t' text nicely. However, I didn't like t' way t' shock cord was supposed t' be attached. Avast! Blimey! Ahoy! Blimey! T' shock cord was originally t' be inserted through a slit in a fin, matey, matey, then held in place with a glued strip o' gauze. I thought this would expose t' shock cord t' deflected motor exhaust at launch time and t' gauze attachment looked very permanent. Instead, I drilled a small hole in t' fin, shiver me timbers, threaded t' hole with a 9" length o' Keelhaul®©™ cord, and tied t' cord t' itself makin' a loop around t' fin. I tied t' remainin' free end o' t' cord t' a round elastic shock cord. I also didn't like t' friction-fit motor idea. I felt that gettin' a friction-fit motor out o' t' power pod would be a royal pain and that t' friction fit motor would nay reliably kick t' pod out at ejection time, arrr, which would be disastrous. Arrr! Blimey! So t' improve reliability and convenience, ya bilge rat, I added a motor retainin' wire t' t' pop pod.
Finishing:
I used sandin' sealer and 400 grit sandin' paper t' seal/smooth t' fins and t' balsa adapter. Ahoy! I spray painted t' rocket body, minus payload section and nose cone, shiver me timbers, with Krylon White Primer then with Krylon Gloss White. Aye aye! T' nose cone be already white so I didn't paint it. Begad! Blimey! I then added finishin' touches with Pactra Trim Tape and some snazzy iridescent stickers that were locally available.
Construction Rating: 4 out o' 5
Flight:
T' plans recommend A8-3, me hearties, B6-4, B14-5, me hearties, and C6-5 motors. Ya scallywag! I suggest that A8-5, me bucko, B4-6, B6-6, matey, arrr, and C6-7 motors might be more appropriate since t' aft ejection works a bit better after apogee with t' model in nose down position.
Parachute preparation requires a bit o' care since t' chute, matey, lines, and cord must be arranged on t' power pod before t' pod is inserted into t' aft o' t' body. Avast! T' pod's centerin' rings are only about 1.5" apart so t' available space is pretty small. Arrr! Well, blow me down! Gettin' t' power pod into t' body is a bit iffy as well, since t' shock cord, arrr, arrr, chute, and shroud lines must nay be squished betwixt t' pod's centerin' rings and t' body, arrr, otherwise t' fit may be too tight. At least it doesn't need wadding. Ya scallywag! Avast! Once t' pod is inserted, me hearties, insertin' t' motor is easy. Ahoy! Just insert t' igniter and plug into t' motor and insert t' motor into t' pod.
First flight was with an A8-3 with 10 mph winds. Begad! T' model boosted smoothly straight up with no noticeable spin or weathercocking.
Recovery:
T' model was approachin' apogee still pointin' straight up at ejection time. T' pod popped out nicely and t' parachute deployed. This looked a bit odd, as t' parachute seemed t' act as a drag chute with t' model over t' parachute for a short while. Avast! Blimey! Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! T' model then swung under t' chute and descended at a moderate rate. Avast! Blimey! T' chute be only half open on t' way down. Blimey! Blimey! I found later that t' shroud lines were nay evenly tied. Ya scallywag! Blimey! Despite that, t' model landed gently in t' grass with no damage. Blimey! Blimey! Next time, I will use a longer coast duration t' avoid t' "drag chute" behavior.
Flight Rating: 3 out o' 5
Summary:
T' main PROs o' this model are impressive flight performance, arrr, good looks, me bucko, and aft ejection. Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! I had used t' aft ejection idea with me Boddomuk design for Descon 11 and have had great success with it although it always works better when t' rocket is pointin' down at ejection time. I am eager t' try a night flight with this model with a small glow tube as payload.
T' main CON o' this model is that flight preparation is iffy with gettin' t' chute, shiver me timbers, shroud lines, ya bilge rat, shock cord, and power pod stuffed into t' aft o' t' model.
Overall Rating: 4 out o' 5
Sponsored Ads
 |
 |