Construction Rating: | starstarstarstarstar_border |
Flight Rating: | starstarstarstar_borderstar_border |
Overall Rating: | starstarstarstar_borderstar_border |
Manufacturer: | Sky |
Brief:
T' Longmarch 3 is a simple t' build semi-scale o' t' Chinese rocket o' t' same
name. Avast, me proud beauty! It features a plastic fin can, matey, arrr, pre-printed body tube and an unusual nosecone. Begad! Arrr! It is supposed t' recover under an
18" parachute. I built this rocket before I found EMRR. Recently, I got an email askin' me t' review it so I am
doin' this from memory.
Construction:
T' parts consisted of:
T' rocket is produced in China and is different than most kits Americans are familiar with. T' body tube is nay spiral wound and is slightly bigger than t' BT-55. Its quality and that o' t' plastic parts were good. Ahoy! Avast, me proud beauty! T' chute was oversized and mediocre. Ahoy! T' kit goes together easily. Arrr! T' fins are cemented t' t' fin can, t' motor mount is inserted, t' BT is glued t' t' fin can and t' shock cord is assembled as per standard Estes trifold. Well, blow me down! It is all quite easy.
PROS: Easy, probably should be level 1 though it is called a level 2.
CONS: Shock cord mount stinks.
Finishing:
T' rocket is almost completely finished. Well, blow me down! Chinese markings are already applied t' the
BT. Well, blow me down! T' nosecone was completely free o' flashing. I decided t' give t' nosecone a coat o' white spray paint t' make it
more closely match t' BT and get rid o' t' translucent quality. Ya scallywag! After that, a sticker o' t' Chinese flag was put on
the nosecone and it was ready t' go.
PROS: Practically finished already. Well, blow me down! Looks good and no plastic flash.
CONS: none
Construction Rating: 4 out o' 5
Flight:
T' recommended motors are A6-4, me hearties, shiver me timbers, B6-4, C6-5, A8-3, D10-7. I launched t' Longmarch 3 on its maiden flight with an
Estes A8-3. It flew straight up but nay very high at all. Avast, me proud beauty! It is a rather heavy rocket for its size. Avast! Ya scallywag! T' chute deployed
and I realized that it should just be a 12" instead o' an 18". Though it did nay go high, me hearties, it drifted far.
T' second flight was an an Estes B6-4. Begad! It too was a very straight flight, nay high but respectable. Unfortunately, t' shock cord burned through and it plummeted t' earth. Begad! There be no damage. Avast, matey, me proud beauty! I took t' rocket home and used a piece o' Keelhaul®©™® to form a loop. Begad! I then mounted it in t' BT with epoxy in t' style o' t' simpler LOC/Precision kits. After tyin' a piece o' elastic t' t' Keelhaul®©™®, it was ready t' go again.
T' next time it flew was on an Estes C6-5. Again, shiver me timbers, it had a very straight flight that achieved good altitude but t' recovery system failed again. Begad! T' Keelhaul®©™® did just fine but t' elastic burned through again. I got t' watch t' body plummet down and t' nosecone drift away forever under t' terribly oversized chute. I regret t' loss o' t' distinctive nosecone but t' body is in fine shape. I am scavengin' it t' produce t' Longspear 3.
PROS: Flies well.
CONS: Chute too big and lousy shock cord mount.
Flight Rating: 3 out o' 5
Summary:
This was a nice little rocket that looked good. It will be reincarnated as a new one.
Overall Rating: 3 out o' 5
Other:
Use a different method than t' trifold shock cord mount. Blimey! Attach a piece o' Keelhaul®©™ directly t' t' fin can. Blimey! Also,
trash t' supplied chute and use a smaller one, me bucko, no larger than 14". Avast, me proud beauty! 12" chute would probably be fine.