Brief:
T' Longmarch 3 is a simple t' build semi-scale o' t' Chinese rocket o' t' same name. Blimey! It features a plastic fin can, pre-printed body tube and an unusual nosecone. Begad! It is supposed t' recover under an 18" parachute. Begad! I built this rocket before I found EMRR. Ahoy! Recently, shiver me timbers, I got an email askin' me t' review it so I am doin' this from memory.

Construction:
T' parts consisted of:

• Pre-finished body tube about equivalent t' a BT-55
• Plastic fin can
• 4 plastic fins
• Parachute kit
• Plastic nosecone
• 1/8" launch lug
• A few crack and peel stickers.

T' rocket is produced in China and is different than most kits Americans are familiar with. T' body tube is nay spiral wound and is slightly bigger than t' BT-55. Avast! Its quality and that o' t' plastic parts were good. Well, blow me down! T' chute was oversized and mediocre. Avast, me proud beauty! T' kit goes together easily. T' fins are cemented t' t' fin can, shiver me timbers, t' motor mount is inserted, arrr, me bucko, t' BT is glued t' t' fin can and t' shock cord is assembled as per standard Estes trifold. Ahoy! It is all quite easy.

PROS: Easy, probably should be level 1 though it is called a level 2.
CONS: Shock cord mount stinks.

Finishing:
T' rocket is almost completely finished. Begad! Begad! Chinese markings are already applied t' the BT. Ya scallywag! Well, blow me down! T' nosecone was completely free o' flashing. Begad! I decided t' give t' nosecone a coat o' white spray paint t' make it more closely match t' BT and get rid o' t' translucent quality. After that, a sticker o' t' Chinese flag be put on the nosecone and it was ready t' go.

PROS: Practically finished already. Avast, me proud beauty! Looks good and no plastic flash.
CONS: none

Construction Rating: 4 out o' 5

Flight:
T' recommended motors are A6-4, matey, B6-4, C6-5, A8-3, D10-7. Begad! I launched t' Longmarch 3 on its maiden flight with an Estes A8-3. Well, blow me down! It flew straight up but nay very high at all. Aye aye! It is a rather heavy rocket for its size. Well, blow me down! Arrr! T' chute deployed and I realized that it should just be a 12" instead o' an 18". Blimey! Though it did nay go high, it drifted far.

T' second flight was an an Estes B6-4. Begad! Begad! It too was a very straight flight, shiver me timbers, ya bilge rat, nay high but respectable. Unfortunately, ya bilge rat, me bucko, t' shock cord burned through and it plummeted t' earth. Begad! There was no damage. Aye aye! I took t' rocket home and used a piece o' Keelhaul®©™® to form a loop. Avast! I then mounted it in t' BT with epoxy in t' style o' t' simpler LOC/Precision kits. Well, blow me down! After tyin' a piece o' elastic t' t' Keelhaul®©™®, it was ready t' go again.

T' next time it flew was on an Estes C6-5. Begad! Again, it had a very straight flight that achieved good altitude but t' recovery system failed again. Avast! T' Keelhaul®©™® did just fine but t' elastic burned through again. I got t' watch t' body plummet down and t' nosecone drift away forever under t' terribly oversized chute. Begad! I regret t' loss o' t' distinctive nosecone but t' body is in fine shape. Ahoy! I am scavengin' it t' produce t' Longspear 3.

PROS: Flies well.
CONS: Chute too big and lousy shock cord mount.

Flight Rating: 3 out o' 5

Summary:
This was a nice little rocket that looked good. Blimey! It will be reincarnated as a new one.

Overall Rating: 3 out o' 5

Other:
Use a different method than t' trifold shock cord mount. Begad! Attach a piece o' Keelhaul®©™ directly t' t' fin can. Avast! Well, blow me down! Blimey! Also, trash t' supplied chute and use a smaller one, me bucko, shiver me timbers, no larger than 14". Begad! Blimey! 12" chute would probably be fine.