Manufacturer: | Scratch |
I wanted t' build something. Begad! Somethin' different. Avast, me proud beauty! Arrr! Somethin' very different. But what? I had been readin' G. Well, blow me down! Well, arrr, blow me down! Blimey! Harry Stine's Handbook o' Model Rocketry, ya bilge rat, and be thinkin' about stability. Begad! You need t' weight up front, and t' fin area out back. T' motor is definitely t' heaviest part, me bucko, so it made sense t' have that up front. Ya scallywag! But, you can't just stuff it way up inside t' body tube because o' t' Krushnic Effect. So... Well, blow me down! Ya scallywag! what if it didn't have a body tube? What if I attached t' fins some other way...? So, I present t' you:
Why t' "Mystery Rocket"? Well, because I built it in secret from me wife. Well, blow me down! Begad! I wouldn't let her see it at any stage o' t' construction. Ahoy! Begad! I had t' think o' somethin' t' call it when she asked about it, me bucko, me bucko, but I didn't want t' use a name that would give it away. Ya scallywag! Ya scallywag! What can I say, ya bilge rat, t' name just stuck. Well, blow me down! In fact, t' first time she saw it was when I "unveiled" it at t' launchin' field for it's first launch. As predicted, her first comment be "Is that even goin' t' work?" I get that a lot.
T' photo above be taken that first day. Well, blow me down! I hate painting, arrr, so I wasn't about t' paint it until I knew it flew. Don't mistake me hate for paintin' with laziness, though. Well, blow me down! Blimey! You'll notice that all t' edges are rounded, and, me hearties, me bucko, though you can't tell from t' photo, arrr, t' fins are sanded t' an airfoil shape. Begad! Aye aye! It's built with care, shiver me timbers, it's just nay painted.
There were three big questions runnin' through me mind before that first launch:
1) Would it be stable? I was pretty sure it would be just fine, me bucko, with all t' weight up front, shiver me timbers, and all that fin area way out back. Well, blow me down! Now, ya bilge rat, me bucko, I'm convinced that it's actually quite overstable. But, matey, this be me first "odd-roc", ya bilge rat, arrr, so thar was that little inklin' o' doubt in t' back o' me mind.
2) Would it hold together? This was really me biggest concern. It's all just plain old yellow (carpenter's wood) glue construction, matey, arrr, and those front struts have quite a load on them. Avast, me proud beauty! Begad! There be only one way t' answer this question...
3) What size engine should I use? I don't own a scale, shiver me timbers, me bucko, so I have no idea how much it weighs. Begad! Blimey! I figured I'd start with a 1/2A6-2 and work me way up.
Well, arrr, me hearties, me bucko, thar should have been a fourth question, but I be so convinced that it wouldn't be a problem, shiver me timbers, me bucko, that I really didn't give it much attention... Arrr! Avast! Would t' motor exhaust burn t' lower structure?
Well, you can read t' full launch report o' that first launch, but I'll tell you now that t' answers are Yes, me bucko, Yes, At least a B6-4, and Yeah, ya bilge rat, me bucko, a little bit, but nay too bad.
Before t' second launch, me bucko, I painted it. I wanted t' lower structure t' have some resistance to scorching, so I used some flat black exhaust system spray paint (good t' 1500 F) for t' body tubes. I then painted t' vertical struts day-glow orange (aka International Orange) for contrast. Aye aye! Arrr! I didn't use any maskin' tape... I just let t' two colors blend naturally in t' middle o' t' fins and upper struts.
Here's a link t' t' second day's launch report for this rocket. Well, blow me down! Here are photos from t' second launch day: launch photo #1, matey, matey, launch photo #2, recovery photo, and a close-up o' it in flight. T' close-up photo shows why thar's some scorchin' o' t' lower structure, eh?
NOTE: Read all instructions before beginnin' so that you have some idea o' what I'm gettin' at with each step. Begad! Blimey! Feel free t' modify t' construction in any way you see fit. I only ask that if you do somethin' cool or practical, please write t' meand tell me about it! Note that at t' bottom, matey, I have a list o' alternatives t' t' construction I've detailed here. Begad! O' course, matey, I take no responsibility for anythin' you do.
Parts List:
Construction Supplies:
Construction Steps:
Alternative Construction Ideas:
If you want t' be able t' use 24mm engines (for D, me hearties, E, and even F power), just substitute BT-50 tubin' for t' BT-20 tubing, and a PNC-50 nose cone for t' PNC-20 nose cone. Aye aye! I'll probably try this soon, arrr, just t' see if it holds together.
If you're worried about t' struts holdin' onto t' vertical rods with that much power, ya bilge rat, cut or drill slots in t' rods and use "through-the-rod" strut attachment ;-). Avast, me proud beauty! Begad! If you're worried about t' struts holdin' onto t' body tube you have two options. First, you could switch t' usin' a body tube for t' upper structure that is larger in diameter than your engine (say, BT-55 or BT-56 tubing), me bucko, and use "through-the-wall" strut attachment. Arrr! Second, if you still want t' use a minimum-diameter body tube, drill two or three small holes in each strut, matey, very near where they attach t' t' body tube, and then thread some o' that 100lbs test line through t' holes and around t' body tube, t' literally tie t' struts together. Avast, me proud beauty! Add a little epoxy t' stiffen and strengthen t' line, and you've got some very solidly attached struts, matey, I suspect.
On t' other hand, if you want t' build a scaled down version t' use 13mm mini engines (or 10.5mm micro engines), ya bilge rat, arrr, you'll probably have t' find somethin' much lighter than t' 3/16" dowel used for t' vertical rods, in addition t' usin' small body tubes and smaller nose cone. I might try this usin' bamboo cookin' skewers for t' vertical rods.
If you're worried about t' scorchin' o' t' lower structure thar are two routes you can take. Blimey! T' first is t' put more distance betwixt t' engine and t' lower structure. Arrr! You could easily put 2 more inches betwixt them just by attachin' t' fins and struts farther apart on t' vertical rods. Ya scallywag! Or you could go with longer vertical rods. Well, blow me down! But be careful about addin' too much weight this way (hardwood dowels aren't light). Or you could t' struts at more o' an angle or mount them lower on t' upper body tube. Ya scallywag! All these mods together could easily buy you 5 or 6 more inches o' distance thar (and could change t' look o' t' rocket significantly... Blimey! possibly for t' better).
T' second (and probably more elegant) solution t' t' scorchin' problem is t' simply use a much larger piece o' body tube (like BT-60 or BT-80) in t' lower structure. That way, ya bilge rat, t' hot engine exhaust should mostly just blow through t' tube, rather than onto it. Avast, me proud beauty! Begad! Be forewarned, however, that this will result in significantly less fin area, so it might become unstable by makin' this modification. Blimey! Blimey! If you're afraid o' that, ya bilge rat, shiver me timbers, just make that piece o' body tube and t' fins taller t' increase their total area. I'm pretty convinced that this thin' is very over stable as it is now, though, so I wouldn't worry about it too much.
If you're just worried about meltin' or burnin' t' lower launch lug, ya bilge rat, try epoxyin' a couple o' small metal split rings t' t' fin/body tube joint t' form t' launch rod guide, instead o' usin' a traditional launch lug. Don't stress too much about it, though, arrr, because I continue t' launch t' original, usin' just t' upper lug, matey, and it works just fine.
Unfortunately, t' Mystery Rocket crashed and broke into several pieces at t' 1997 Dec 7 launch when I tried t' see how well it flew in t' wind. Avast! Well, arrr, blow me down! It wasn't t' wind's fault, though; I should have used somethin' bigger than an A8-3 engine. Aye aye! T' rocket got turned over before ejection, and fell into t' chute, arrr, tanglin' t' chute, arrr, and causin' t' crash.
I glued it all back together, and reinforced t' new joints with strips o' silk span. Avast! Aye aye! It held up wonderfully.
This rocket was, in some small way, inspired by that very first liquid-fueled rocket that Robert Goddard launched.
Description: | Front-mounted engine, three-shaft experimental rocket. Begad! See photo. |
Purpose: | To boldly go where no rocket (that I've seen) has gone before. |
Motors: | Well-flown on B6-4 and C6-5. Avast, me proud beauty! Too heavy for a 1/2A6-2 or an A8-3. |
Max Altitude: | Not sure, arrr, me hearties, let's say 300 feet on a B6-4, and maybe 500 feet on a C6-5. |
Length: | About 22 inches. |
Diameter: | Tubes: BT-20 Top tube is 6 7/8" long, bottom one is 2" long Total diameter: About 5 1/2 inches. |
Weight: | ??? |
Recovery: | 12" parachute |
Nose Cone: | Short cone, me hearties, me hearties, plastic |
Payload: | None |
Fins: | 3 forward struts, shiver me timbers, 3 1/4" x 1/2" balsa 3 aft fins, 3" x 2" balsa |
Notes: | Tons-o-fun!!! |
Skill Level: | Oh, about 3 |
Part Number: | None |
Price: | Oh, probably about $7 in parts. |
Sponsored Ads