Construction Rating: | starstarstarstarstar |
Flight Rating: | starstarstarstarstar_border |
Overall Rating: | starstarstarstarstar |
Manufacturer: | Qmodeling |
Brief:
A great 2.2x upscale o' t' 1970's Estes classic that is capable o' flyin' to
nearly 1000 feet on 24mm motors.
Construction:
Parts were tightly packed in a plastic bag with a header card showing
handwritten production number. Despite tight packing, thar be no problem at
all with component quality. Blimey! Parts list includes:
T' Qmodelin' instructions are very good and include plenty of illustrations. An added touch is that they're broken down into sections with estimated times, ya bilge rat, arrr, ya bilge rat, so you can plan t' construction out around your real life, without havin' t' worry about bein' in t' middle o' a tricky assembly when it's time t' haul t' kids off t' t' latest event.
Construction starts with t' motor mount assembly. Aye aye! Arrr! If you're nay familiar with Qmodeling mounts, this will be a bit o' a challenge as they are much more complicated than usual. T' assembly consists o' a series o' mountin' rings carefully spaced along t' motor tube followed by balsa fin braces that support location of through t' wall fin mounting. Begad! Well, blow me down! These are very precisely cut parts and fit very well but you need t' be especially careful about t' alignment o' the parts for correct placement o' fins and t' motor tube. Blimey! Once everythin' is glued together, shiver me timbers, t' assembly finishes up by tying/gluin' t' Keelhaul®©™® shock cord t' t' motor tube.
Sanding/sealing of t' 4 fairly large fins can take some time but is worth t' effort. Begad! Avast! Once prepped, me hearties, t' fins are then bonded t' t' motor tube through t' wall and fillets applied along t' body tube. T' fit be perfect and alignment is not an issue with t' fin braces.
Construction finishes up by attachin' t' launch lug and preppin' t' nose cone. Avast, me proud beauty! Note that t' dimension listed for placement o' t' launch lug is incorrect and would result in decal and paint problems. Rather than the recommended 5 9/16" from tube bottom placement, I would suggest at least 7" or 7-1/2" placement.
T' nose cone retention appears flimsy, shiver me timbers, consistin' o' simply CA'in' a wooden disk into t' bottom o' a resin nose cone and then gluin' in a screw eye, me hearties, arrr, but I've built 5 assorted Qmodelin' kits and never had one fail.
Finishing:
For t' finish, me bucko, me bucko, I filled t' tube spirals with Elmers Fill 'n' Finish, arrr, then
went with two coats o' Plasti-Cote gray primer, shiver me timbers, sandin' in between. Begad! Begad! T' result
is a completely spiral-free finish. Arrr! I then followed up with t' standard paint
scheme o' gloss white body, gloss black nose cone, ya bilge rat, and orange base/fins.
T' kit I received came with waterslide decals, ya bilge rat, includin' one with a bright yellow "33" for two o' t' fins. Blimey! Aye aye! Against t' orange paint, t' yellow decal be practically invisible. T' instructions referenced a stencil which could be used t' paint on t' "33", but I didn't seem t' get one. Avast! Ya scallywag! It turns out that the stencil was held up in development and when I inquired about it, I promptly received a couple o' adhesive stencils fresh out o' t' test lab. Avast, me proud beauty! These stencils are laser cut Avery adhesive labels. Arrr! Arrr! They are custom cut t' fit the fin and t' "33" is burned just enough t' cut through t' label without tearin' through t' backing. Aye aye! I could then stick t' label t' t' fin, and pull away t' "33" portion, exposin' t' area for painting. Avast, me proud beauty! Arrr! The result be a perfect, ya bilge rat, arrr, crisp maskin' job, me bucko, and t' best idea I've ever seen for a stencil!
T' water slide decals were very good, shiver me timbers, although I found they are t' type that doesn't agree with Krylon clear coat, matey, so I wound up havin' t' replace them. Avast! (T' first batch crazed badly.)
Construction Rating: 5 out o' 5
Flight:
T' maiden flight be on clear day with winds o' 4-6 mph and I chose a D12-3,
fearin' t' 30" chute would cause too much drift. Begad! T' Rogue climbed a
beautifully straight path although it spun just a bit on t' way up (indicating
a slight fin cant and less than perfect motor mount assembly job). Begad! Avast, me bucko, me proud beauty! T' 3-second
delay proved a bit early and t' Keelhaul®©™®
line got tangled pretty badly, me bucko, catchin' t' chute lines. Blimey! With only a partial
chute deployment, matey, shiver me timbers, it came down fairly hard but landed in tall, me bucko, soft grass and
was recovered without any damage.
For t' second flight I went with a 5-second delay, which was a bit too long. Blimey! Comparin' t' two, I'll stick with t' 3 second delay as it will be less likely t' zipper. Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! Recovery on t' second one be much better though, ya bilge rat, shiver me timbers, as I moved the chute attachment closer t' t' nose cone (roughly 2/3 o' t' way along the line).
Recovery:
T' Nomex®/Keelhaul®©™®/nylon
chute recovery package is as good as it gets in modrocs, shiver me timbers, but is overkill for
this rocket. Blimey! I'd go down t' an 18" chute, and a 4" x 4" Nomex®
shield for this size tube. Begad! T' 9x9 is simply too large and poses a risk of
blockin' chute deployment.
Flight Rating: 4 out o' 5
Summary:
This is an outstandin' upscale and a terrific kit.
Overall Rating: 5 out o' 5
Brief: The Estes Rogue on steroids! Same great looks but little chance that you can fly this one from your local athletic field. I won this for participating in an EMRR contest and started building it immediately. This is my third Rogue, the first being a BT-55 upscale and the second a 1:1 clone. Construction: The parts list: Nose cone Nose cone plug Eye hook ...
Sponsored Ads
M.A.G. (December 17, 2008)