Estes Porta-Pot Shot

Estes - Porta-Pot-Shot {Kit} (2145) [2006-2008]

Contributed by Frank Casey

Construction Rating: starstarstarstarstar_border
Flight Rating: starstarstarstarstar_border
Overall Rating: starstarstarstarstar_border
Manufacturer: Estes
Estes Porta-Pot Shot

Brief:
This is a new Estes Kit. Blimey! Blimey! It is a single stage kit and recovery is by parachute and also a white streamer meant t' look like toilet paper. Arrr! Blimey! (I don't make this stuff up...)

Construction:
T' body itself is styrofoam and comes in two sections. Avast, me proud beauty! T' roof o' t' rocket is made o' hard plastic. Begad! It also has four clear plastic fins that attach t' the bottom o' t' kit in order t' make it stable for flight. Ahoy! Clay nose cone weight is also provided. Arrr!

T' build only takes about an hour or so. Ahoy! T' instructions were typical Estes high quality with one potential "gotcha". Well, blow me down! T' kit comes with two heat shields, one for t' roof and one for t' bottom o' t' model. Ahoy! In the instructions you are told t' attach t' top and bottom heat shields before the fins are attached. Well, blow me down! Arrr! If you do this on t' bottom o' t' kit, you would have to cut through t' shield t' insert t' fins easily in me opinion. It's best to attach t' bottom shield before gluin' t' fins in.

Estes Porta-Pot Shot

Finishing:
A PRO regardin' finishin' would be that it's fairly straightforward.

CONs are as mentioned above that t' heat shield attachment needin' t' be done before fin placement. Avast! Avast! Also paintin' is a potential issue. Begad! T' kit tells you only t' use styrofoam safe paint on t' body, me hearties, which I couldn't find, so I actually used Testor's model paint on t' body. Begad! I used regular white spray paint for t' roof and t' fins I left clear.

I mixed Testor's blue and white paint t' come close t' t' package paint scheme and I think I nailed it pretty good. Begad! Begad! I painted three coats on and it really looks great. Avast! I normally don't like t' use brush on paint on models because I can never get t' finish right, however, on t' styrofoam, me hearties, it went on without a brush mark. Begad! Decals are stick on, me bucko, nay water slide, me bucko, and they worked great for this kit.

Construction Rating: 4 out o' 5

Flight:
Prep is fairly easy, aside from havin' t' cram t' 12 inch chute into t' small tube inside t' body o' t' rocket. Aye aye! Aye aye! There just isn't much space t' put the chute into along with a couple sheets o' recovery wadding. Arrr! Arrr! T' chute basically sits right on top o' t' engine and it's a very tight fit.

There was a prevailin' wind o' 18-20 miles per hour. Arrr! We were right near the coast in Rhode Island and I be nay crazy about launchin' t' rocket under those conditions, arrr, but me son had his heart set on seein' it fly. Arrr! Begad! I decided to forgo t' recommended B6-2 engine and move t' a C. Ya scallywag! I didn't have any C6-3s with me so it was flown on a C6-5.

T' rocket flew fairly straight under t' circumstances. It didn't fly very high though, me bucko, maybe 150 feet or so. Begad! It really had t' fight for altitude being shaped like an outhouse, me bucko, along with battlin' t' heavy wind comin' off o' the ocean. Begad! Begad! T' 5 second delay was too long. I suspect on a day without wind that a C6-3 would be a great flight. Ya scallywag! Ahoy! Ejection on this flight was only about 60 feet above ground and since t' chute is so tightly compressed into t' compartment, it didn't open in time. It acted like a streamer and t' rocket came down too quickly. Blimey! Ahoy! However, arrr, me hearties, since we launched in a avast field thar was no damage. Arrr! Well, blow me down! If it had been a regular field or pavement, matey, t' clear fins would have snapped for sure and probably t' foam body would have been damaged.

Recovery:
Amazingly, me bucko, t' chute itself was nay burned even though it sat right on top of the engine. It looked great post-flight. Avast, me proud beauty! Arrr! Blimey! There was some slight scorchin' t' the underside heat shield that prevents t' foam body from bein' burned during takeoff, however, me hearties, t' rocket itself is in excellent shape. Arrr! Begad! Blimey! I am lookin' forward to launchin' this rocket in a no winds from a regular field usin' a C6-3. Begad! Blimey! I will nay be usin' a B engine on this rocket since it just doesn't fly that high. Ya scallywag! T' chute needs time t' unfold and grab air and I doubt a B engine will give it that time. Begad! Blimey! Either way, I am nay goin' t' chance it. Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! This is a great lookin' conversation piece rocket that actual flies and it's nay goin' t' get away from anyone on a C6-3 engine.

Flight Rating: 4 out o' 5

Summary:
I really like t' kit because it is unique and a real conversation piece, at least with people who have a good sense o' humor. Also, me bucko, t' sayin' on t' front of t' package "Fly t' crap out o' it" gave me a good laugh also. Begad! Avast!

Overall Rating: 4 out o' 5

Flights

Comments:

avatar
D.E.B. (December 28, 2006)
This kit was fun to do. Instructions were right on, pretty straight forward. The only change I made was on the motor mount/body tube assembly. To insure that I got a tight fit between the styrofoam body halves and the body tube(steps 5+7), I didn't glue the "green" adapter rings in place until I was ready to mount the assembly to one of the body halves. This guarantees you will not have to trim the tube flush with top of the foam should your measurements have been off. Overall, a quick build, what a gas!! LOL! Sorry for the bad joke!
avatar
S.K. (March 6, 2007)
This kit was very fun to build, it takes about an hour, easy to read instructions. The second flight was better than the first under windy conditions, my only recommendation is to use a C6-3 motor and not a C6-5, the ejection time is to long. Try not to launch on windy days.
avatar
K.L.M. (April 13, 2008)
A colleague from work bought this kit and asked me to assemble it. I took it home and unpacked all the parts. After doing so, I noticed the main body tube was basically a 24mm motor mount. Instantly I said to myself, "HMMMMM, I wonder.". I called the colleague to get his permission to "upgrade" and he emphatically said "YES!". I wanted to have the capability of launching on both 18mm and 24mm engines. So started my upgrade. I started by dry fitting all the components. I then marked all the locations of rings, motor clip, top and bottom. I notched the bottom ring to accommodate the motor clip. I then made my own adapter from parts from the kit. I added another 18mmx24mm centering ring to the bottom so it would stick out the 1/4" as before and the motor clip would hold it in place. The 18mm motor would then be friction fit into the adapter. We got the chance to fly the "Pot", as we call it, last week(04-08-08). We first flew it on a C6-3. Not very high, chute came out but did not open, landed hard but no damage. We had to launch it with a D. We loaded it with a D12-3 and man did it go! Now that's what I call "Flying the Crap out of it!". Again the chute did not work and landed so hard it bounced breaking all but one fin loose. Everyone got a good laugh. We had lots of fun. After I got home, I examined the "Pot" again. I decided to put a sleeve in the area where the shock cord goes. I will then pack the chute in this area instead of in the motor tube. Things were just too tight in there. I'm actually thinking about buying another one and making it a rear ejection (pardon the pun).

comment Post a Comment