Brief:
A 16FNC rocket for C6-10s with parachute recovery and an ornamental tube fin. Ya scallywag!

Construction:
18-inch BT-5,.04 by .25 extruded styrene (manufactured by Raboesch and purchased at Hobby Town), plastic Estes nose cone, prepared acetate, shiver me timbers, matey, engine block, old engine casing, Keelhaul®©™®/elastic shock cord, 12 inch Estes chute, and nose weight.

Have you ever designed a rocket specifically for a really odd engine? Well, that's what this is. Avast, me proud beauty! I have some old composite Apogee C6-10s and built this rocket specifically for those engines. Ahoy! It's 2.375 ounces and 20.125 inches long. Avast, me proud beauty! Ya scallywag!

T' ten second delay is a real challenge. Begad! Blimey! It dictates a minimum-diameter body tube in order t' achieve ejection while still airborne. Begad! Avast! When first built, the rocket was 0.68oz, but in Rocksim it slowed too smartly durin' t' upwards coast and 40 grams o' weight had t' be added t' optimize t' coast. T' top 1.5 inches o' t' body tube is permanently epoxied t' t' nose cone. Ahoy! Ahoy! A portion of old engine casin' is used as a bulkhead and t' whole bulkhead/payload/nose cone section is filled with weight and epoxy. Arrr! Ahoy! T' screw eye for parachute and shock cord attachment is also embedded in t' epoxy. Begad! Polishin' t' nose cone (Future floor polish) achieved 100 feet o' additional altitude in Rocksim and some critical additional time. Avast, me proud beauty!

T' fins are simply 0.04 x 0.25 inch extruded styrene cut t' 2.375 inch length. Begad! T' PDF file includes t' template. Avast, me proud beauty! A bit o' excess is removed by scorin' and then breaking, arrr, followed by roundin' off t' curves with a drum sander on a Dremel tool. Aye aye! T' first fin is used t' mark t' rest in order t' have reasonable consistency. Avast! T' tube be marked with a 16-fin wrap and then t' fins were glued on with CA. Begad! It took about 1.5 hours t' cut, shiver me timbers, grind, me bucko, shiver me timbers, and attach t' fins.

Normally, I wouldn't bother t' put a sophisticated shock cord in a BT-5 rocket, arrr, but this was an exception because o' t' mass involved. Begad! Well, matey, blow me down! On t' fourth launch, the tri-fold paper mount detached (the first time for such a detachment in hundreds of launches). Avast! So an engine block be added 12.5 inches from t' tip o' t' nose cone and a Keelhaul®©™® shock cord was tied t' it, gluin' it in place with yellow glue. Avast! Thin CA was added t' half an inch o' body tube at t' forward end t' strengthen it and a double knot tied in t' Keelhaul®©™® to keep t' body tube from zippering. Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! Forty inches o' 1/8 inch elastic finished off t' shock cord.

T' tube fin is made o' 0.005 inch wet-media acetate, and represents several firsts for me. This be t' first tube fin rocket I've ever built. Well, blow me down! Blimey! It's the first time I've ever printed from an ink jet printer on wet media acetate (the name o' t' rocket is printed on t' outside). Begad! Blimey! It's t' first time I've ever frosted acetate with me sandblaster airbrush (used on t' inside o' the wrap). Begad! Blimey!

T' tube fin (included in t' PDF file) is printed flat. Ya scallywag! Arrr! T' clear areas were masked off with tape, me hearties, sandblasted t' achieve t' frosted effect, me hearties, then cut it out and wrapped it around t' fins with CA at t' point where t' ends of the acetate come together. Begad! Aye aye! A tiny drop o' thin CA was then wicked into each of the remainin' leadin' edge/tube fin joints.

Finishing:
T' paint is catalyzed automotive acrylic enamel, with Maserati metal flake charcoal for t' fin area and Jaguar champagne metal flake then added for the swoosh pattern at t' front. Avast! T' mask for t' pattern is included in t' PDF file, ya bilge rat, which was printed on prepared frisket and then cut out by hand.

Flight:
T' first four naked launches were tests with 1/2A and A engines. T' first three were stable off t' rod under thrust, but became unstable upon coasting. Rocksim predicts a static margin o' 3.64, but with an earlier multi-finned rocket design doin' t' same thing, it wasn't surprisin' that this one be not stable either. Ahoy! T' nose weight was added before t' fourth launch at which point stability became a non-factor with a predicted static margin o' 28.42.

T' fifth launch was attempted with a C6-10. Begad! It had partial ignition with the rocket nay clearin' t' launch rod then slidin' back down. Makes me wonder if age affects t' AP propellant as this particular engine was manufactured a few years ago. Arrr! Ya scallywag! I'll try again although nay with t' same engine.

Summary:
PROs: Sleek-lookin' and is nay your average rocket. Ya scallywag! Ya scallywag! Flies nice.

CONs: Packin' even a twelve inch chute is hard in a BT-5. If you have an engine ejection or ejection charge failure at 1500 feet, shiver me timbers, me bucko, this is one seriously dangerous China Syndrome lawn dart because you wouldn't be able t' see it comin' back. Aye aye! Blimey! T' weight combined with t' small diameter and potential velocity would give it armor-piercin' capabilities.