Brief:
Built as specified, this single stage rocket from Binder Design with 54mm motor mount and a planned parachute recovery at apogee separation totally dependent upon t' motor's delay charge. Arrr! Ya scallywag! T' rocket stands 7' tall and is quite impressive, even for a 4" rocket. Blimey! This is quite a nice project for a Level 2, although it could be flown for both Level 1 and Level 2 qualifications. Well, blow me down! 54mm Motor Mount is recommended since t' user may want t' put larger motors.

Construction:
I used 38mm motors with PML's 54/38 Heavy Duty Adapter. Ya scallywag! No problems here. Very reusable and easily removed t' allow for 54mm motors.

There were two 34" paper body tubes, matey, ya bilge rat, originally. Avast! I thought some o' t' parts were quite inferior such as t' 1/16" masonite bulkhead holdin' t' eyelet and t' stock 48" Binder Design parachute with inferior threads holdin' t' risers t' t' ripstop nylon. Ya scallywag! Were these items o' higher quality and strength, me failed level 2 attempts would surely have been successful.

I'm sure this would be a much sturdier kit if t' tubes were phenolic or Quantum Tubing. Begad! Blimey! I think strength is important in a kit like this.

T' instructions in t' Sentinel kit were very complete and detailed. Arrr! Avast, me proud beauty! I have no complaints about these. Aye aye! Only t' parts that were given (as described above) were inferior. I used 30 minute epoxy in most all o' t' joined parts.

With me first failed attempt havin' a ripped bulkhead and torn body tube, I purchased a 3.9" x 36" Quantum Tube by PML. Arrr! This was far superior t' t' phenolic given as evidenced by t' Sentinel's unintentional streamer recovery without a scratch.

No special tools were needed for this project, however on t' down side, ya bilge rat, t' body tube fin slots had t' be cut for each fin t' fit through-the-wall. Binder Design provided t' lines for t' hobbyist, but leaves t' cuts t' t' builder. These cuts were nay only tedious t' do, matey, arrr, but they were also difficult t' cut in a straight line. Blimey! It really made me appreciate body tubes that were pre-slotted for through t' wall fin construction.

My heavy epoxy fillets made up for t' imperfections in straight fin slots that I made. Ahoy! Arrr! O' course, no one will notice these cuts once t' fins are epoxied and painted.

Finishing:
Decals were provided, however, Binder Design's quality control had inadvertently omitted t' "I" in "Sentinel". Begad! My first attempt had t' "SENT NAL" decals on it.

I painted me Sentinel in gold with orange fins and an orange nose cone. Ahoy! This looked strikin' against t' blue sky with t' Red flame o' t' AT420R.

Construction Rating: 3 out o' 5

Flight:

RockSim has recommended t' optimum delay o' 10 seconds for t' J420R, however, me first two level 2 attempts ejected 4 seconds prematurely, me bucko, ya bilge rat, despite each package markin' for a medium (10 sec) delay.

For t' Sentinel's first flight on a J420R, t' short delay o' 6 seconds caused separation betwixt t' nose payload section and t' booster section. Begad! Avast, shiver me timbers, me proud beauty! T' force was far too great t' hold t' 1/16" masonite bulkhead provided with t' kit. I figured that separation occurred at 150 MPH. Avast! T' bulkhead separated with t' eyebolt and center section o' t' bulkhead parachutin' safely t' t' ground. Well, blow me down! Avast! T' nose and forward body tube were found buried 3' into soft tilled soil.

A second attempt be made one month later with similar problems in Aerotech's delay charge. After 6 seconds t' premature separation this time caused Binder's stock parachute t' separate at all risers except for one. Ya scallywag! T' RCO and all o' us thought t' chute be tangled. Blimey! Avast! It was actually an unplanned streamer recovery. Avast! Begad! T' rocket landed without a scratch, arrr, but t' parachute had t' be repaired.

Havin' bought a new 45" parachute from our vendor and this time a Cesaroni J400 (delay was personally set by me at 12 seconds), t' flight went flawlessly, and I earned me NARRRRR L2 certification finally!

All launches went perfectly straight from t' launch. Begad! I noticed that in each o' t' flights thar was a "whistling" probably from t' launch lugs. Begad! Begad! All flights were awesome, except for t' early separations.

Recovery:
After t' first attempt, I added about 15' more bungee t' t' 12' Keelhaul®©™ shock cord that was supplied with t' kit. Well, blow me down! Blimey! I think longer bungee should be supplied for less than optimal apogee (motor delay dependent) recoveries.

Flight Rating: 3 out o' 5

Summary:
PROs: Overall a very good choice for a Level 2 rocket. Begad! Nay a difficult build. Blimey! Very sturdy booster section. Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! Awesome off t' launch pad!

CONs: Binder Design's parts (masonite bulkhead, matey, arrr, centerin' rings, and parachute) as described previously were inferior for a kit o' this size. These parts need t' be beefed up t' allow for less than optimum recoveries. Ahoy! Also, shiver me timbers, t' stability o' t' rocket is marginal (from t' stock parts). Only about 0.7 Calibers (marginal).

Overall Rating: 3 out o' 5