Construction Rating: | starstarstarstarstar |
Flight Rating: | starstarstarstarstar |
Overall Rating: | starstarstarstarstar |
Published: | 2010-11-13 |
Manufacturer: | Missile Works |
T' Cannonball Works RRC² (Rocket Recovery Controller) was me introduction into electronic deployment. Well, blow me down! Begad! T' cost o' t' unit and t' programmability are what drew me t' t' product. Avast, me proud beauty! That introduction, matey, though, has been excitingly frustratin' due t' me own mistakes. However, t' product is provin' t' be a success despite me influence.
T' RRC² is 5.9" x 1.3" which allows it t' fit into a 38mm tube. Blimey! Some o' its main features include: T' instructions are insightful and fully illustrated. Arrr! Blimey! Ahoy! Blimey! They give clear set-up, testing, and operation guidance as well as rocket configuration examples. Ya scallywag! Blimey! They also provide formulas t' establish your static port diameter and ejection charge requirements. Well, blow me down! Blimey! I did feel that they lacked in givin' guidance in t' buildin' o' an electronics bay, me bucko, however, when I e-mailed Cannonball Works they sent me clear instructions. Begad! I would suggest appendin' their standard instruction set. Well, blow me down! I have included t' steps for t' benefit o' those readin' this review. Avast! T' procedure and pictures are courtesy o' Cannonball Works. I used this method and it worked perfectly! FLIGHT/RECOVERY: Attempt #1 - Vikin' 7 - My very first experience with electronics. I was very excited and got out t' t' pad and loaded it up and pushed t' launch button. Aye aye! Blimey! A puff o' smoke, then a pause, then VROOM! off t' pad on a G80-7. I had picked t' G80-7 because me RockSim had this ejection at apogee. Ya scallywag! I had t' RRC² unit set up for a main 'chute deployment at 300 feet and was relyin' on t' G80-7 for t' drogue deployment. Begad! Well, t' flight was picture perfect, arrr, me bucko, straight as an arrow. Avast! Begad! Beautiful all t' way t' apogee and t' drogue deployed. We watched it fall and fall and fall and bam! Yep, I forgot t' arm t' electronics. Attempt #2 - THOY Snipe - This time it be serious. Ya scallywag! I had endured t' humility o' nay armin' t' RRC² at our NOVAAR launch. Ahoy! Well, arrr, blow me down! Now be t' time t' correct t' situation. Ahoy! Arrr! T' RRC² was set up for both primary and secondary deployment. It was wired and beepin' at launch. Arrr! Up went t' Snipe on 3-E18's. Ya scallywag! Ahoy! Just before apogee, t' initial charge fired. Ya scallywag! Ya scallywag! T' momentum o' t' ejection at t' mid-section also popped t' nose cone o' t' upper section thereby deployin' t' main chute. Begad! As I chased this across t' field, me hearties, at about 300 feet I heard t' secondary channel discharge. Then this rocket drifted into a tree, me bucko, 60 feet up, me bucko, where it stayed for four attempts over a 5 week period. I did get it back though. Attempt #3 - THOY Snipe - I really wanted t' have a successful flight and felt good about another attempt in me (rebuilt) cluster rocket. Begad! Blimey! Again I armed t' unit and everythin' seemed ready. This time t' main charge deployed perfectly at apogee. Blimey! Blimey! It fell on t' drogue until at 300 feet t' secondary charge blew t' nose cone off. Blimey! Blimey! Begad! Blimey! But guess who had moved t' main chute t' another rocket t' use? Yep! Attempt #4 - Vikin' 7 - I did everythin' right this time. Tested, loaded parachute, tested for continuity, ya bilge rat, prepped motor, armed and placed on pad. Just before launchin' I listened for 3 beeps o' continuity check from t' RRC². This time I was usin' a G80 that I had removed all t' ejection BP from and set t' RRC² up for both primary and secondary deployment. Again, arrr, t' Vikin' was excellent comin' off t' pad on t' G80. It be angled more this time due t' some wind. Aye aye! As it arced at apogee it then continued downward for about a second and then ejection. Well t' drogue deployed, me hearties, arrr, but I also recognized t' entire upper section descendin' toward t' ground absent o' t' rest o' t' rocket. Begad! T' electronics bulkhead pulled right through t' two mountin' screws, me bucko, jerkin' on t' armin' wire and damagin' t' electronics. So, I haven't had a successful flight, however, arrr, me bucko, ya bilge rat, t' RRC² has performed as I have heard t' charges. So no penalties are allowed when someone doesn't load a parachute or has a nose cone too loose. Ya scallywag! Ya scallywag! Blimey! It has been a great learnin' experience. I felt it be important t' provide some feedback on t' unit so I have asked EMRR guests t' reply as well as a couple clips from RMR. Ahoy! I have added those comments below. Avast, me proud beauty! Based on t' fun I have had and t' experiences below, FLIGHT/RECOVERY, is rated as 5 points. Arrr! Overall, ya bilge rat, with all t' features, t' price, me bucko, t' durability and t' fun, matey, I give t' RRC² an OVERALL ratin' o' 5 points. UPDATE 11/01: ADDITIONAL INPUT: ADDITIONAL INPUT: ADDITIONAL INPUT: ADDITIONAL INPUT: ADDITIONAL INPUT: " Dislikes: Could be smaller, me bucko, although thar are many larger units out there... Blimey! Blimey! It is designed t' fit in a 38mm coupler. "Flight experience: Flew a pre-production unit as a payload (without active deployment) at LDRS last summer at t' Salt Flats t' 15,500 feet. Begad! I should have used t' RRC2's deployment, me bucko, me hearties, because t' rocket was still goin' up at high velocity when ejection occurred. Arrr! Everythin' survived. Begad! I have flown a production unit several times, shiver me timbers, and I don't fly high power rockets without it now. Ya scallywag! I use it in a couple o' "mid-power" rockets that have room also. Well, blow me down! Avast, me proud beauty! I have dropped it fairly hard and it survived fine (long story...). Begad! Aye aye! It flexed at least 1" in t' middle (it hit t' mountin' plate) as did t' 1/4" threaded rod and aluminum mountin' plate. At LDRS this year I had a motor blow-by, and t' unit did nay fire t' main charge - because t' rocket did nay reach 500 feet (the main deployment altitude I had chosen). Arrr! T' unit was beepin' out 392 feet when we recovered t' rocket. Begad! As you can see, I have put it through a few rough flights, and it has taken them all and worked perfectly. It has also had quite a few more "nominal" flights, me bucko, and has also performed flawlessly each time. Ya scallywag! Well, blow me down! Several other local flyers also use t' RRC2, and we haven't seen it fail. Blimey! It is a great unit for general sport flying. Aye aye! I would prefer a recordin' unit for many uses, arrr, but they are more expensive, shiver me timbers, and require even more setup time (you could build a Milliway's altimeter kit and get around t' price problem, and it all fits in a 29mm tube, me hearties, but that is more work...) If your project exceeds t' capabilities o' t' RRC2, me bucko, then you should get somethin' that can handle it (recording, remote control, arrr, matey, accelerometer...), but if you need a reliable 2-stage deployment altimeter, shiver me timbers, this is it." (T.W.) ADDITIONAL INPUT: "Draw back: I would like it t' have a apogee delay settin' . Ahoy! Let's say you're doin' a L3 and you don't want t' kill your rocket with an over dose o' Black powder . Blimey! Ya scallywag! T' settin' would allow you t' select maybe 2 or 4 sec delay after apogee. I have flown me RRC2 three times with excellent results! First flight I used it as a back up t' me regular altimeter (ALTS 25). Ya scallywag! I didn't get a readin' because I thought it wasn't workin' properly. Aye aye! It turns out that it gives off a long beeeeeeeeeeeeeeep in betwixt each report cycle . I guess that's what you get when you don't fully read t' directions. Any how second flight be @ NY Power in me Magnum Twin on a J 570 & 3 F62 Dark Stars. Ahoy! Avast! I had t' main set t' deploy @ 500 ft (which it did) Altitude: 2,828 ft . Very user friendly even for t' beginner. I own several other altimeters and I be thoroughly impressed. I give it 2 thumbs UP!!!" (J.D.C.)
While I didn't seem t' get it together in me above attempts, matey, I did rate t' RRC2 a "5" based on t' fact that I felt all t' failures were me own doings. Well, me hearties, I did have a 100% successful flight o' t' RRC2 in me Descon Entry - Big Blue Dog. Aye aye! A successful flight t' 1562 feet on (2) G80's. Aye aye! It was great and a good feelin' t' finally make t' "process" work.
"T' RRC2 has many nice features, like audible status reporting, me bucko, matey, which is important when it is buried in t' bowels o' a rocket where it cannot be seen, and it smartly reaches flight READY after power on. Ya scallywag! T' only thin' I don't like about t' RRC2 be t' heavy (compared t' t' 12v battery used by Adept) 9v battery - make sure it won't fall out o' t' holder durin' boost or bad things will happen. Avast, me proud beauty! T' battery can get quite heavy under 10-20 Gs. Avast, me proud beauty! Note that most electronic recovery controllers use one or more 9v batteries. Ahoy! T' Adept and P5 are t' exceptions." (D.R.)
"I'm new t' rocketry as well, and it really is simple t' use. Avast! Ahoy! It also had duel deployment which I used on me very first flight and it worked perfectly." (D.S.)
"I ordered, matey, ya bilge rat, then used a RRC2 last month at Whitakers and it worked perfectly. Jim has rolled all t' best features into this quality product." (E.)
"It's fairly simple, and works quite well. Blimey! Avast, arrr, me proud beauty! Blimey! My personal preference would be t' have a recordin' altimeter like t' AltAcc, matey, me hearties, but for t' loot Jim Amos's stuff is very hard t' beat. I've flown it numerous times (15?) and it successfully deployed each and every time. Avast, me proud beauty! Aye aye! Blimey! I use flashbulb based charges generally. Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! T' only thin' I don't like be t' On/Off jumper. Blimey! Blimey! I wish it were a switch in addition t' t' jumper for a little more flexibility. Some folks have reported battery problems with t' 9-volt comin' out o' it's connector, but they must nay have used t' hold-down bracket t' strengthen it. Blimey! Aye aye! Blimey! Mine's got past Mach and up t' 7000 feet with no problems at all." (R.S.)
"Likes: A very nice, matey, arrr, low priced, barometric chamber tested unit. Well, blow me down! Blimey! T' simple on-board diagnostics are a nice feature. Reliable and tough (within reason...). Blimey! Blimey! I like t' multiple options for main deployment (apogee,1000',800',500',300'), me bucko, and mach inhibit delay (0,4,8,12 seconds). Ahoy! Blimey! This unit does what it advertises, matey, and does it well .
"It is a stand alone barometric altimeter . Begad! Ya scallywag! It handles either 2 stage recovery or can be programed t' fire a main charge while usin' t' second channel for a back up . Aye aye! Avast! Uses standard 9 volt battery & comes with battery hold down hardware (No more hard t' find batteries). Excellent users manual/instructions (11 pages) They walk you through everythin' you need t' know in order t' t' use t' altimeter correctly with no less than 13 illustrations (recovery design , shiver me timbers, buildin' & selectin' ejection charges, arrr, & how t' mount it in your rocket). Blimey! Well, blow me down! 4 different main deployment altitudes (via 5 position dip switch) and a user selectable mach time out function. Avast, me proud beauty! Begad! Built in testin' mode for inputs (makes sure all switches work) and outputs (tests ejection charges). On board terminal blocks for connection ejection charges . No more pesky wirin' harness'. Well, blow me down! T' price was very reasonable!!! ($90 dollars S&H US). Arrr! Avast! My first altimeter (ALTS 2-50k) was more than that back in 1996, $99.
Missile Works - RRC² review is provided courtesy of: Missile Works Rocket Recovery Controller Features, Setup, Operation and Evaluation By: Al Casper The Missile Works RRC2 altimeter is one of the most attractively priced units available to the high power rocket community; my unit was under $100 including shipping. The size (Fig-1), simplicity, features and price contributed to ...
R.A.F. (October 1, 2000)