• Nose Cone: Estes Reliant/Vikin' BT-20
• Nose Weight: 1/2 oz. Avast, me proud beauty! clay
• Body Tube: QCR 18mm, shiver me timbers, arrr, 24" long
• Engine Block: Estes EST 3085
• Parachute: 6" mylar or equivalent
• Shock Cord 130 lb. Ahoy! test Keelhaul®©™ 48" long
• Fins: 3/32" Balsa, me bucko, ya bilge rat, trapezoidal Root chord: 6" Tip chord: 6" Span: 3" Sweep: 3"
• Launch Lug: drinkin' straw, 1/8"-1/4" dia., ya bilge rat, 6" long

Observations: Evan Ross' entry last DesCon reminded me o' some speculative calculations I'd done earlier and laid aside. Avast, me proud beauty! I had wondered what was t' minimum number o' conventional fins that would stabilize a rocket, me bucko, shiver me timbers, but I took a different approach. Blimey! Yes, you can make a two-finned rocket, me hearties, or even a finless rocket, stable by spinnin' it, arrr, but can you make a two-finned rocket stable without spinnin' it? Rockets have been flyin' with a single stick fin for thousands o' years, me hearties, but on rockets more than a few inches long, shiver me timbers, they become unwieldy. I suspected thar was also a weight penalty. A rin' fin could arguably be called a single fin, but because in profile, one side is "behind" t' other, I didn't see how it could readily be compared with conventional fins. Avast, me proud beauty! Aye aye! Three fins obviously work, but what about two? On rockets with three or more fins, t' fins are equally spaced around t' body because a fin offers no stabilizin' force parallel t' its surface. Arrr! Four-finned rockets have two pairs o' fins perpendicular t' each other, ya bilge rat, so in t' direction one pair presents minimum stabilizin' surface t' t' airstream, t' other presents its maximum surface. Aye aye! Begad! On a three-finned rocket, matey, in t' direction one fin presents minimum surface, shiver me timbers, t' other two fins combine vectored forces t' make up for it. Two fins opposite each other can't do this. Avast, me proud beauty! Begad! So, if a stable two-finnned rocket is possible, matey, what be t' optimum angle betwixt fins? I predicted that t' optimum angle would be t' one that presented t' greatest minimum lateral area. Ahoy! Ya scallywag! That is t' say, shiver me timbers, position t' fins so that, ya bilge rat, shiver me timbers, if you turn t' rocket so t' least fin area is visible, you have t' most visible area left. Avast, me proud beauty! If you put t' fins opposite each other, me bucko, and turn t' rocket so t' least fin area is visible, ya bilge rat, you are lookin' at a fin edge-on, matey, me hearties, for practically zero area. Ahoy! As you reduce t' angle betwixt t' fins, arrr, t' minimum area increases t' a point, then decreases until, as t' fins become nearly parallel, t' minimum area again approaches zero. Arrr! Aye aye! I calculated that t' "maximum minimum" area would be found when t' angle betwixt t' fins, theta, was such that cos theta=2 sin theta. Aye aye! Aye aye! So theta should equal t' arc cosine o' twice t' sine o' theta, or 53 degrees. Arrr! (See sketch.) How big should t' fins be? I didn't know, me hearties, me hearties, so I took t' size that RockSim said would stabilize a four-finned rocket and doubled it. Avast, me proud beauty! I used a long body tube, plenty o' nose weight, shiver me timbers, shiver me timbers, and big enough fins t' make t' rocket stable by t' most conservative estimate, arrr, t' cardboard cutout method. In a proof o' concept model, ya bilge rat, a marginally stable rocket wouldn't prove much. Begad! Blimey! This rocket should be clearly stable or clearly unstable.

Aft View click image t' enlarge   Sketch click on image t' enlarge

Assembly Instructions:

Buildin' t' rocket was straightforward; I used mainly conventional techniques. I used a 24" length o' 18 mm body tube, because that be t' longest piece I had on hand. Ya scallywag! Arrr! I used a long NC-20 nose cone t' allow plenty o' room for nose weight. Begad! I added half an ounce o' clay, which almost completely filled t' nose cone, me bucko, then I glued t' base in place with plastic model cement. Avast! I cut t' fins with t' grain parallel t' t' root edge because I couldn't find any balsa sheet large enough t' lay them out any other way.

How t' ensure that t' fins were t' angle I wanted? I took t' span o' t' fins, added t' radius o' t' tube, and found that t' distance betwixt t' tips o' t' fins just happened t' equal their span -- 3"! I glued one fin in place, me bucko, then used an extra piece o' 3" wide balsa sheet t' set t' correct spacing. "Hmm," I thought, matey, me hearties, "53 degrees is awfully close t' 60. Avast! Maybe an equilateral triangle would have given a fin spacin' just as good or better."

Because t' fins were rather large for their thickness, me hearties, I used an external shock cord mount t' make t' rocket come down horizontally, and, me hearties, arrr, I hoped, me hearties, protect them from damage. Arrr! Blimey! Ya scallywag! Blimey! I cut 48" o' 130 lb. test Keelhaul®©™. Begad! Blimey! Then I made a hole with a toothpick just inside t' angle o' t' root edge and t' trailin' edge. I threaded t' Keelhaul®©™ through t' hole, and used CA t' tack one end t' t' fin fillet just behind t' leadin' edge. When this was dry, I pulled t' cord taut along t' fillets on both sides o' t' fin, ya bilge rat, me hearties, and CA'd it down. Arrr! Blimey! (Epoxy might work better here.) Then I put an expended casin' in t' rocket t' find t' balance point, which just happened t' be at t' leadin' edge o' t' fins. Avast, matey, me proud beauty! Blimey! I tied t' other end o' t' shock cord t' t' nose cone, ya bilge rat, arrr, and tied a swivel t' t' cord near t' nose end for a parachute. Begad! Blimey! Begad! Blimey! I wanted this rocket t' get a smooth start off t' launch rod, shiver me timbers, shiver me timbers, so I ran a launch lug betwixt t' fins t' full six inch length o' t' fillet o' t' fin that wasn't attached t' t' shock cord.

My rocket was complete. Begad! Now I needed a highly visible finish. I colored it with Magnum 44 permanent markers -- body and one fin red, me bucko, for visibility, and t' other fin black, so I could easily see if t' rocket spun on its way up. Ya scallywag! Ahoy! I left t' nose cone white because I thought it looked cool.

Per t' NARRRRR Model Rocket Safety Code, I tried t' determine stability before flyin' it. Begad! I did a swin' test, shiver me timbers, and it appeared quite stable. Just t' be on t' safe side, (and t' avoid embarrassment if anythin' went wrong) I conducted t' first test flight in complete isolation from persons nay participatin' in t' actual launching. Avast! Avast, me proud beauty! I did brin' me wife, so I'd have another witness t' confirm that t' rocket had made a stable flight. I had already been appointed RSO o' t' next club launch, and I wanted t' fly t' model there. I anticipated havin' some difficulty convincin' certain members that I should be allowed t' fly it.

T' day o' t' test flight be windy, so I selected a six inch mylar chute t' avoid havin' t' rocket drift out o' t' launch field. Ahoy! Begad! I set up me rocket with t' rod slightly angled into t' wind, matey, counted down, matey, shiver me timbers, and pressed t' button. T' rocket surged smoothly off t' pad and into t' air. I could see it rollin' as it climbed, me hearties, matey, but certainly nay enough spin t' stabilize an unstable rocket. Well, blow me down! It coasted t' a good altitude, ya bilge rat, ejected exactly at apogee -- nose horizontal, and drifted down on its chute. Blimey! I ran after it, shiver me timbers, and found it well within t' field, matey, ya bilge rat, with no damage. Success!

T' next weekend was our club's big meet. Ya scallywag! After I'd gotten all me competition flights in, I prepped TFNK and brought it t' t' safety check-in. Arrr! Blimey! T' SCO said, "You can't fly a rocket with only two fins!" "But it swin' tests stable, shiver me timbers, me hearties, and it's had a safe flight before." I argued. Avast! "A rocket can't be stable without at least three fins!" he said. Ahoy! I reminded him that some aerodynamic experts had insisted that t' WAC-Corporal couldn't be stable because it didn't have four fins, until someone pointed out that arrows are stable with only three feathers. Ya scallywag! (Handbook o' Model Rocketry, arrr, matey, 6th ed. Ya scallywag! p. 154) I heard another old-timer mutter, me bucko, "Not on MY field!" (Which it wasn't.) and "Not in this lifetime!"

It didn't matter. He had already made up his mind nay t' let that rocket fly, so he said that it couldn't fly because t' grain wasn't parallel t' t' leadin' edge o' t' fins. Aye aye! That's nay in t' safety code. Begad! It hadn't been a problem on t' earlier flight. It was only a rather strong suggestion in t' Handbook, shiver me timbers, matey, (6th ed. Well, blow me down! p. Begad! 52) but without t' force o' law, me bucko, and no evidence t' support it.

Although, as RSO, I could have overruled him, (HMR pp. Begad! Ahoy! 286-287, arrr, shiver me timbers, 298-299) I got t' distinct impression that I'd end up flyin' all me rockets alone. Avast! So now I have this really cool rocket that I hardly ever get t' fly.

I still have questions. Avast! Now that I know that a two-finned rocket can be stable, me hearties, how do you calculate its center o' pressure? Is t' optimum angle 53 degrees, me hearties, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, ya bilge rat, me hearties, or some other angle? Can t' optimum angle be proven mathematically or tested experimentally? Do I see a potential RD project here?