Presented with written permission from RocketyPlanet:

Product Review by Dr. John Smolley, MD
Wednesday, June 18, me bucko, 2008

Photo 1: T' many, shiver me timbers, many parts in this kit are o' very good t' excellent quality

Bungee jumpin' for t' fainthearted?

T' new Backdraft, me hearties, a BT-60 based three-foot rocket from Heavenly Hobbies, appears ordinary enough in its package, that is until you start lookin' for instructions. Begad! Avast, me bucko, me proud beauty! There are none. Well, blow me down! At least no written instructions. Ahoy! Aye aye! For those you need t' enclosed computer CD.

Steve Shannon has commented on t' issue o' CD-ROM-based instructions in t' Brutus review. Arrr! It's one o' those personal preference items like whether you want your meat near raw or well done. Begad! I liked them well enough, arrr, but like Mikey, me bucko, I'll eat me steak either and any way. Avast, me proud beauty! It is what else that is on t' CD-ROM, ya bilge rat, shiver me timbers, which makes this most ordinary lookin' rocket, arrr, well, ya bilge rat, extraordinary.

Bundled with t' usual kraft cardboard tubing, shiver me timbers, fins, chute, me bucko, cone, ya bilge rat, and t' like is software which helps t' user t' select two motors: one for t' ascent and t' second for t' retrorocket firing. Blimey! Thats right: A retrorocket firin' that is timed and o' sufficient impulse t' stop a screaming, about t' become rubbish, rocket dead in its tracks! Now if you're imaginin' t' rocket t' slow t' a graceful stop, butt-end down, arrr, say like Apollo's Lunar Lander, guess again.

This is more like bungee jumping. Ahoy! Avast, me proud beauty! T' two motors are on either end o' t' rocket, nozzles pointin' north and south. Avast, me proud beauty! Rather than use electronics in a traditional dual deploy arrangement, t' Backdraft goes one step further in its effort t' reduce drift by allowin' t' rocket t' arc over at apogee, come in ballistic, arrr, and then ignite t' second motor at a low altitude, shiver me timbers, me bucko, me bucko, brakin' t' descent sufficiently t' get t' laundry out safely.

Now when it comes t' things like skydiving, shiver me timbers, bungee jumping, or out-of-bounds skiing, ya bilge rat, ya bilge rat, arrr, I must admit I'm a wimp. Blimey! I love t' watch others do it...but given a chance t' let a rocket serve as proxy, me bucko, sign me up. Aye aye! So it was with great anticipation I volunteered t' do this review.

T' Microsoft® Excel®-based software included with t' kit allows one t' compute t' optimal time for t' retrofire and a compatible pair o' motors. Begad! Avast! Generally you need one impulse class down from t' main motor-for example, me hearties, recommended pairs are D12-0/C-11-0; E9-4/D12-0; E15-4/D12-3.

But t' good news here is you are nay limited t' these motors, or even t' Backdraft itself. With careful use o' mass and Cd data, shiver me timbers, t' simulation program works with any "nose motor" equipped rocket (or conventional rocket for that matter). With t' Backdraft, shiver me timbers, shiver me timbers, t' limitation on motors are twofold-the 24mm motor mounts themselves, and on t' fact that t' nose motor is lit by a fuse.

Photo 2: T' semi-exploded view o' t' rocket, showin' how t' parts are laid out. Ya scallywag! Aye aye!

A fuse you say? For those o' old-timers, shiver me timbers, this is nay so shockin' or outlandish. Avast, me proud beauty! Aye aye! In t' old days, me bucko, matey, if you wanted t' airstart a motor with a delay or t' stages were widely separate, shiver me timbers, me bucko, this is how you did it. Avast! O' course thar were failures, but I don't know that t' rate be that much different than with today's advanced electronic timers/flight computers. Ahoy! Well, blow me down! T' stock safety fuse is capable o' ignitin' BP motors only. Aye aye! But with t' size/motor mounts o' t' rocket, thar really is no call for anythin' beyond an Estes E in t' nose.

T' Build:

T' kit itself consists o' forty parts, shiver me timbers, me bucko, consistin' in t' main o' high-quality kraft tubing, a balsa cone reminiscent o' t' original Big Bertha's, arrr, matey, ya bilge rat, plywood fins, and a flat panel nylon chute. Begad! Part fit is very good t' perfect, and so very little additional work was needed t' assemble. Begad! Here t' biggest exception was sandin' t' couplers.

Interestingly, for a rocket o' this size, t' maker recommends epoxy pretty much throughout, shiver me timbers, includin' t' use o' JB Weld or another high temp epoxy for linin' t' inside o' t' hollowed out nosecone. Ahoy! Avast! T' cone is subject t' t' heat o' t' fuse used t' delay/ignite t' retro motor along with t' initial blast o' t' motor itself. Arrr! It's retained by Keelhaul®©™® line and t' chute is later deployed amidship usin' t' ejection charge o' t' retro motor and a piston arrangement.

Photo 3: T' lightly-glassed booster fin can, ready for primer.

T' argument o' epoxy vs. yellow glue is a horse that's been beaten t' death on various forums so let's leave t' flayed nag at t' glue factory. Blimey! Use either, arrr, me bucko, but build strong and be particularly careful about selectin' an adhesive that won't freeze durin' coupler insertions. Blimey! Well, ya bilge rat, blow me down! I came very close myself t' oopsin' it here, even though t' dry fit seemed fine. Aye aye! I chose t' reserve epoxy for t' fins, me hearties, t' fiberglassing, matey, and linin' t' nosecone. (In retrospect, it may have been a better choice for those steps dealin' with t' cardboard couplers.)

As t' t' instructions themselves, shiver me timbers, I was confused on a couple o' occasions, me hearties, but overall they are quite readable and t' accompanyin' pictures were very helpful. Well, blow me down! In total thar are 24 pages, with 1 or 2 steps per page. Avast, me proud beauty! Omitted was any mention o' t' launch lug, I mounted mine near t' flight-ready balance point.

What would have been a nice addition (at least for t' mechanically challenged like myself) would be t' inclusion o' an "exploded" diagram so that one has a good sense from t' beginnin' o' where all 40 parts go, and how they fit together.. Begad! But definitely, matey, me hearties, and nay me habit, shiver me timbers, ya bilge rat, matey, these are best read from top t' bottom before startin' t' build.

What wasn't clear t' me until I got me hands on t' kit and software is that t' booster fin can is designed t' separate before t' retro ever fires. Begad! If you plan on usin' tumble recovery, matey, build it strong. Ahoy! Begad! (I used 2 layers o' light FG t' beef up t' tube, ya bilge rat, and epoxy fillets throughout t' through-the-wall construction t' enhance durability.) Which comes t' me next point: thar be plenty o' cargo room within t' fin can for its own recovery.

Photo 4: On t' left, me bucko, me hearties, t' cap that protects t' chute from t' primary ejection charge. Arrr! On t' right, arrr, me mod t' add a streamer t' t' booster fin can. Photo 5: T' prepped rocket with streamer in place in t' fincan. Avast, me proud beauty!

So I decided t' attach a high strength shock line t' t' fin can for two reasons. Ahoy! Blimey! T' first is that thar be no reason (given you're careful in protectin' t' chute or streamer from t' ejection gases), that t' booster can't have its own recovery, and secondly by connectin' it t' t' shock line o' t' top half o' t' rocket, matey, one can fly this rocket in a conventional mode, leavin' out t' retro motor entirely. (For single motor use I would simply connect a short length o' booster shock line t' t' cap coverin' t' "sustainer" chute tube and untie t' cap's tether. Ya scallywag! Blimey! Begad! Blimey! At ejection thar should be enough force/momentum t' pull t' chute free as t' booster separates. I haven't tested this, however.)

Photo 1 shows t' many, ya bilge rat, many parts in this kit are o' very good t' excellent quality. A few differ slightly from t' pics on t' CD assembly, but with care, arrr, arrr, will all fit together as intended.

Photo 2 is a semi-exploded view o' t' rocket. Begad! Arrr! T' retro motor ejection charge is vented back toward t' fins and uses a piston t' eliminate t' need for wadding. Arrr! T' chute deploys just aft o' t' second set o' fins. A sleeved cap protects this end from t' ejection charge o' t' primary motor.

T' lightly-fiberglassed fin can ready for prime coats is shown in Photo 3. Begad! Blimey! This section separates from t' rest o' t' rocket at t' primary motor's ejection charge. Begad! T' 95mm motor length ends at t' leadin' edge o' t' fins, givin' you an idea o' t' amount o' room for a chute or streamer, versus t' default tumble recovery.

In photo 4, me bucko, shiver me timbers, t' left side, taken from t' instructions, matey, arrr, is o' t' aft end o' t' vent/chute compartment, arrr, showin' t' clever cap and tether arrangement that protects t' chute from t' primary ejection charge. Avast! On t' right in t' same photo it shows t' mod I did: by drillin' a small hole in t' front centerin' rin' o' t' fin can, I attached some o' t' surplus Keelhaul®©™ in t' same way t' use as a shock cord for t' booster recovery/single stage option mentioned above. Photo 5 shows t' prepped rocket with streamer in place in t' fincan.

T' hollow nose cone, me bucko, shiver me timbers, shown in photo 6, has a groove in which t' Keelhaul®©™ tether is stowed durin' ascent. Avast! Avast! T' attachment point is near t' tip o' t' cone so it dangles along side t' rocket durin' t' retro burn. Avast! This will be lined with hi-temp epoxy t' protect t' fragile balsa cone from t' blast o' t' retro motor.

Photo 6: T' hollow nose cone, showin' t' groove in which t' Keelhaul®©™ tether is stowed durin' ascent. Ahoy! Well, blow me down! Photo 7: Both ends mean business in this rocket. Aye aye! Blimey! Aye aye! Blimey!

About t' Software:

I was concerned regardin' t' assumption that every hobbyist wantin' t' build this bird has access t' Microsoft's Excel and Word (or even wants to). Begad! Well, blow me down! So I made sure that both t' simulator and instructions were compatible with shareware that is available on t' Internet. Arrr! I used t' Sun Microsystems Openoffice suite and was relieved t' find all went well-almost that is-like Steve I had some glitches, matey, but in t' end man prevailed over machine!

First, matey, I suspect this kit might raise a collective eyebrow in t' rocket community-if nay for t' ingenuity o' t' product, me bucko, from t' standpoint o' safety concerns. Ahoy! After all, arrr, what separates a ballistic core-sample recovery and a gentle, happy landin' is a few inches o' cannon fuse, a successful retro motor ignition, shiver me timbers, me hearties, arrr, and math. Aye aye! Begad! Fortunately, matey, me bucko, t' math is done for you in t' spreadsheet: it comes with data entry for several Estes and AeroTech C-F impulse motors. Avast, me proud beauty! By manually enterin' a small RASP-style data set, ya bilge rat, any motor nay pre-entered can also be simulated.

Preppin' t' rocket begins by selectin' t' motors usin' t' included simulation program:

T' accompanyin' instructions are quite clear. Blimey! T' first thin' is t' select a couple o' motors and deliberately pick too long a delay. That is shown in t' accompanyin' chart. Avast, me proud beauty! Ahoy! Impact occurs at about T+17 seconds. Begad! Begad! (Yellow curve is altitude, me bucko, t' violet velocity, and black, acceleration).

This be t' lawndart come true scenario: obviously 17 seconds is beyond t' upper limit o' t' fuse induced delay o' retro ignition.

T' motors used in this simulation were t' Estes E9/D12 combo. T' second chart reveals a situation we are also tryin' t' avoid, that o' completely overcomin' t' downward (negative) velocity and overshootin' a near standstill t' t' point o' a significant upward velocity.

Photo 8: Backdraft poised on one o' C.R.A.S.H. pads. Awaitin' it's maiden voyage as Todd Edmands assists with t' pad. Ahoy! Blimey! Begad! Blimey!

As cool as t' bungee bouncing/pogo-stick flight might seem, matey, thar be one small problem with this: t' fins are on t' wrong side o' t' rocket! Stability will be maintained only while thar be sufficient downward velocity. Begad! Arrr! An overshoot beyond this velocity would most likely lead t' some harmless skywriting, shiver me timbers, but it is at least potentially unsafe and one will lose style points.

Ok, shiver me timbers, so what if we were t' let it drop longer and therefore have a greater ballistic velocity t' overcome. T' results are shown in t' next chart: while better in t' sense that t' peak positive velocity is nay as great, ya bilge rat, shiver me timbers, arrr, this situation is also t' be avoided.

Goin' back t' t' bungee metaphor, me hearties, if you want your bungee long enough t' plunge within three inches o' t' ground, first ask yourself are you really that confident, t' cord won't stretch just a bit more than predicted? Same here; t' software assumes perfectly vertical flights under specific conditions with exactly so much impulse. Ya scallywag! Motors vary, conditions vary, Mr. Avast! Murphy (of Murphy's Law) has been known t' attend launches. Blimey! Avast, matey, me proud beauty! So please do yourself, shiver me timbers, ya bilge rat, your friends and any spectators a favor-take heed o' t' designer's advice by givin' yourself a significant margin o' error, especially in early flights or with unflown motor combinations. Well, blow me down! Remember t' line about "there are old pilots and thar are bold pilots, but thar aren't any old and bold pilots".

By now, shiver me timbers, it is hopefully clear that t' D12 retro motor is just too big. Ahoy! So next step is t' try a smaller impulse motor. T' C11 be handy, as well as a recommended pairing, arrr, so lets give that a shot. Ya scallywag! Ahoy! In t' next chart t' improvement is readily apparent. Well, blow me down! Aye aye! Blimey! T' rocket brakes perfectly, shiver me timbers, matey, only briefly showin' any positive velocity. Arrr! Lets see what can be done by shortenin' t' delay.

Voilà! In this chart, you can see we still have t' near-perfect brakin' and at a considerably higher altitude. Aye aye! Consider it cheap flight insurance.

T' final screen in t' series shows t' H.H. Ya scallywag! Blimey! Simit input screen. Avast! Blimey! Arrr! Blimey! With t' Backdraft kit, all data comes preloaded along with t' advice t' weigh your own rocket. Mine actually came in significantly lighter for t' sustainer, and a bit lighter for t' booster where I fiberglassed and added a lightweight streamer.

Photo 9: A closeup o' t' nosemotor with fuse in place and exitin' via side o' cone. Blimey!

What is nay shown in these plots (and by no means necessary t' t' concept itself) be t' separation o' t' booster. Given t' relatively small number o' choices in delay lengths, thar be nay a lot o' flexibility here-one has three choices, use a short delay for a boosted dart effect, try t' separate at apogee, me bucko, ya bilge rat, me bucko, or carry t' booster well over t' top and eject durin' t' ballistic descent. Blimey! I chose t' keep it simple, shiver me timbers, and chose near apogee separation. Begad! Avast! (Also, arrr, matey, I doubt that t' Simit software would model any additional kick in velocity o' t' "sustainer" section, if t' separate-while-screamin' groundward option be chosen).

Preppin' and Flight:

Much o' that is covered above as t' most important ingredient o' success here is done before you ever get t' t' range. Select a pair o' motors that will work, ya bilge rat, and a delay that is appropriate.

T' next step which I did on t' range was t' measure t' burn rate o' t' fuse. Here a stopwatch is needed and a few inches o' fuse. Avast, me proud beauty! Divide t' time taken t' burn into t' length t' get t' rate. Should be somethin' like 0.5 inches per second (about what t' BATFE defines as deflagration these days ;-D) So a 14 second delay needs 7 inches o' fuse. Begad! In t' end I weenied out by figurin' for about 12-13 seconds delay as I have enough gray hairs as is. Begad! Apart from that, stickin' said fuse in a motor on t' wrong end o' t' rocket, shiver me timbers, and stowin' t' Keelhaul®©™ line in t' nosecone groove, it's a conventional prep that went without a hitch.

T' other different aspect o' preppin' this rocket be t' need t' use two igniters, me bucko, me hearties, one for t' booster motor and t' second t' simultaneously light t' fuse. Well, blow me down! I didn't have me big range box where I keep sundry igniters, pyrogens, shiver me timbers, me bucko, me hearties, and BP. So unsure o' how reliably an Estes igniter would work with Visco fuse, I opted t' manually light t' fuse. Well, blow me down! That way I figured thar would be zero chance o' worst case scenario: successful primary ignition but no joy on fuse. Well, blow me down! Avast, me hearties, me proud beauty! Plus, if for whatever reason t' booster motor didn't light, I'd be close and have time t' yank t' fuse out o' t' nose motor. Well, blow me down! Otherwise one ends up with a humiliatin' static test.

Photo 10: T' author flees t' scene after lightin' t' secondary fuse, but t' Backdraft is already gone.

T' result is shown t' t' left. Begad! Avast! As I'm backpedallin' back from t' pad after ascertainin' that t' fuse had burnt t' t' 13 second mark, t' Estes E wastes no time into comin' t' life. Ya scallywag! Begad! T' rocket wobbled some on t' way up-maybe because o' a high polar moment o' inertia/smallish fins (dumbbell effect owin' t' motors on both ends)-but skyward she went with some anticipated weathercockin' (another reason I weenied a bit on t' delay). T' booster/fincan separated just beyond apogee, and t' heart stoppin' plunge towards Terra Firma began in earnest.

At about 300-400 feet up, me heart resumes beatin' when t' nose motor kicks in and saves t' Backdraft from certain death. Aye aye! That it "overshoots" a bit and does a brief mid-air thrash is easily forgiven. Blimey! Few seconds later, ya bilge rat, we have t' welcome sight shown in Photo 11!

Only one small fly in t' ointment-the yted mine near t' flight-ready balance point.

What would have been a nice addition (at least for t' mechanically challenged like myself) would be t' inclusion o' an "exploded" diagram so that one has a good sense from t' beginnin' o' where all 40 parts go, matey, and how they fit together.. Aye aye! Aye aye! But definitely, shiver me timbers, and nay me habit, these are best read from top t' bottom before startin' t' build.

What wasn't clear t' me until I got me hands on t' kit and software is that t' booster fin can is designed t' separate before t' retro ever fires. If you plan on usin' tumble recovery, build it strong. Begad! (I used 2 layers o' light FG t' beef up t' tube, and epoxy fillets throughout t' through-the-wall construction t' enhance durability.) Which comes t' me next point: thar be plenty o' cargo room within t' fin can for its own recovery.

Photo 4: On t' left, t' cap that protects t' chute from t' primary ejection charge. Avast, me proud beauty! On t' right, me mod t' add a streamer t' t' booster fin can. Photo 5: T' prepped rocket with streamer in place in t' fincan. Ya scallywag! Avast!

So I decided t' attach a high strength shock line t' t' fin can for two reasons. Well, blow me down! T' first is that thar be no reason (given you're careful in protectin' t' chute or streamer from t' ejection gases), shiver me timbers, that t' booster can't have its own recovery, matey, and secondly by connectin' it t' t' shock line o' t' top half o' t' rocket, one can fly this rocket in a conventional mode, arrr, matey, leavin' out t' retro motor entirely. Aye aye! (For single motor use I would simply connect a short length o' booster shock line t' t' cap coverin' t' "sustainer" chute tube and untie t' cap's tether. Begad! At ejection thar should be enough force/momentum t' pull t' chute free as t' booster separates. I haven't tested this, however.)

Photo 1 shows t' many, many parts in this kit are o' very good t' excellent quality. Ahoy! A few differ slightly from t' pics on t' CD assembly, matey, but with care, will all fit together as intended.

Photo 2 is a semi-exploded view o' t' rocket. T' retro motor ejection charge is vented back toward t' fins and uses a piston t' eliminate t' need for wadding. Begad! T' chute deploys just aft o' t' second set o' fins. Ahoy! A sleeved cap protects this end from t' ejection charge o' t' primary motor.

T' lightly-fiberglassed fin can ready for prime coats is shown in Photo 3. Well, blow me down! This section separates from t' rest o' t' rocket at t' primary motor's ejection charge. Arrr! T' 95mm motor length ends at t' leadin' edge o' t' fins, givin' you an idea o' t' amount o' room for a chute or streamer, versus t' default tumble recovery.

In photo 4, arrr, t' left side, taken from t' instructions, shiver me timbers, arrr, me bucko, is o' t' aft end o' t' vent/chute compartment, showin' t' clever cap and tether arrangement that protects t' chute from t' primary ejection charge. Ya scallywag! On t' right in t' same photo it shows t' mod I did: by drillin' a small hole in t' front centerin' rin' o' t' fin can, me bucko, I attached some o' t' surplus Keelhaul®©™ in t' same way t' use as a shock cord for t' booster recovery/single stage option mentioned above. Begad! Photo 5 shows t' prepped rocket with streamer in place in t' fincan.

T' hollow nose cone, shown in photo 6, arrr, has a groove in which t' Keelhaul®©™ tether is stowed durin' ascent. Ahoy! T' attachment point is near t' tip o' t' cone so it dangles along side t' rocket durin' t' retro burn. Aye aye! This will be lined with hi-temp epoxy t' protect t' fragile balsa cone from t' blast o' t' retro motor.

Photo 6: T' hollow nose cone, shiver me timbers, showin' t' groove in which t' Keelhaul®©™ tether is stowed durin' ascent. Ya scallywag! Blimey! Photo 7: Both ends mean business in this rocket. Well, blow me down!

About t' Software:

I was concerned regardin' t' assumption that every hobbyist wantin' t' build this bird has access t' Microsoft's Excel and Word (or even wants to). So I made sure that both t' simulator and instructions were compatible with shareware that is available on t' Internet. Well, blow me down! I used t' Sun Microsystems Openoffice suite and was relieved t' find all went well-almost that is-like Steve I had some glitches, arrr, me bucko, but in t' end man prevailed over machine!

First, I suspect this kit might raise a collective eyebrow in t' rocket community-if nay for t' ingenuity o' t' product, from t' standpoint o' safety concerns. Begad! Ahoy! After all, me bucko, arrr, me bucko, what separates a ballistic core-sample recovery and a gentle, happy landin' is a few inches o' cannon fuse, a successful retro motor ignition, and math. Blimey! Aye aye! Fortunately, me hearties, t' math is done for you in t' spreadsheet: it comes with data entry for several Estes and AeroTech C-F impulse motors. By manually enterin' a small RASP-style data set, matey, any motor nay pre-entered can also be simulated.

Preppin' t' rocket begins by selectin' t' motors usin' t' included simulation program:

T' accompanyin' instructions are quite clear. T' first thin' is t' select a couple o' motors and deliberately pick too long a delay. Begad! That is shown in t' accompanyin' chart. Impact occurs at about T+17 seconds. (Yellow curve is altitude, t' violet velocity, arrr, ya bilge rat, and black, me hearties, shiver me timbers, acceleration).

This be t' lawndart come true scenario: obviously 17 seconds is beyond t' upper limit o' t' fuse induced delay o' retro ignition.

T' motors used in this simulation were t' Estes E9/D12 combo. Begad! T' second chart reveals a situation we are also tryin' t' avoid, that o' completely overcomin' t' downward (negative) velocity and overshootin' a near standstill t' t' point o' a significant upward velocity.

Photo 8: Backdraft poised on one o' C.R.A.S.H. Aye aye! pads. Avast, me proud beauty! Awaitin' it's maiden voyage as Todd Edmands assists with t' pad. Avast, me proud beauty!

As cool as t' bungee bouncing/pogo-stick flight might seem, thar be one small problem with this: t' fins are on t' wrong side o' t' rocket! Stability will be maintained only while thar be sufficient downward velocity. Blimey! An overshoot beyond this velocity would most likely lead t' some harmless skywriting, but it is at least potentially unsafe and one will lose style points.

Ok, arrr, so what if we were t' let it drop longer and therefore have a greater ballistic velocity t' overcome. Ya scallywag! T' results are shown in t' next chart: while better in t' sense that t' peak positive velocity is nay as great, shiver me timbers, me hearties, this situation is also t' be avoided.

Goin' back t' t' bungee metaphor, if you want your bungee long enough t' plunge within three inches o' t' ground, first ask yourself are you really that confident, t' cord won't stretch just a bit more than predicted? Same here; t' software assumes perfectly vertical flights under specific conditions with exactly so much impulse. Avast! Motors vary, conditions vary, Mr. Avast! Murphy (of Murphy's Law) has been known t' attend launches. So please do yourself, your friends and any spectators a favor-take heed o' t' designer's advice by givin' yourself a significant margin o' error, especially in early flights or with unflown motor combinations. Begad! Begad! Remember t' line about "there are old pilots and thar are bold pilots, but thar aren't any old and bold pilots".

By now, it is hopefully clear that t' D12 retro motor is just too big. Begad! Avast! So next step is t' try a smaller impulse motor. T' C11 was handy, as well as a recommended pairing, me bucko, so lets give that a shot. Arrr! Well, blow me down! In t' next chart t' improvement is readily apparent. Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! Avast, me hearties, me proud beauty! Blimey! T' rocket brakes perfectly, arrr, only briefly showin' any positive velocity. Lets see what can be done by shortenin' t' delay.

Voilà! In this chart, you can see we still have t' near-perfect brakin' and at a considerably higher altitude. Arrr! Consider it cheap flight insurance.

T' final screen in t' series shows t' H.H. Ahoy! Simit input screen. Ahoy! Ya scallywag! With t' Backdraft kit, all data comes preloaded along with t' advice t' weigh your own rocket. Mine actually came in significantly lighter for t' sustainer, arrr, shiver me timbers, and a bit lighter for t' booster where I fiberglassed and added a lightweight streamer.

Photo 9: A closeup o' t' nosemotor with fuse in place and exitin' via side o' cone. Well, blow me down! Ya scallywag!

What is nay shown in these plots (and by no means necessary t' t' concept itself) be t' separation o' t' booster. Given t' relatively small number o' choices in delay lengths, shiver me timbers, me hearties, thar be nay a lot o' flexibility here-one has three choices, me bucko, me hearties, use a short delay for a boosted dart effect, try t' separate at apogee, or carry t' booster well over t' top and eject durin' t' ballistic descent. Ya scallywag! Aye aye! I chose t' keep it simple, and chose near apogee separation. Begad! Aye aye! (Also, I doubt that t' Simit software would model any additional kick in velocity o' t' "sustainer" section, if t' separate-while-screamin' groundward option was chosen).

Preppin' and Flight:

Much o' that is covered above as t' most important ingredient o' success here is done before you ever get t' t' range. Ahoy! Select a pair o' motors that will work, and a delay that is appropriate.

T' next step which I did on t' range was t' measure t' burn rate o' t' fuse. Avast, me proud beauty! Here a stopwatch is needed and a few inches o' fuse. Divide t' time taken t' burn into t' length t' get t' rate. Should be somethin' like 0.5 inches per second (about what t' BATFE defines as deflagration these days ;-D) So a 14 second delay needs 7 inches o' fuse. Avast! In t' end I weenied out by figurin' for about 12-13 seconds delay as I have enough gray hairs as is. Begad! Apart from that, stickin' said fuse in a motor on t' wrong end o' t' rocket, and stowin' t' Keelhaul®©™ line in t' nosecone groove, it's a conventional prep that went without a hitch.

T' other different aspect o' preppin' this rocket be t' need t' use two igniters, me bucko, me bucko, one for t' booster motor and t' second t' simultaneously light t' fuse. Well, blow me down! I didn't have me big range box where I keep sundry igniters, arrr, pyrogens, and BP. Well, blow me down! So unsure o' how reliably an Estes igniter would work with Visco fuse, shiver me timbers, I opted t' manually light t' fuse. That way I figured thar would be zero chance o' worst case scenario: successful primary ignition but no joy on fuse. Arrr! Plus, arrr, me hearties, if for whatever reason t' booster motor didn't light, I'd be close and have time t' yank t' fuse out o' t' nose motor. Otherwise one ends up with a humiliatin' static test.

Photo 10: T' author flees t' scene after lightin' t' secondary fuse, but t' Backdraft is already gone.

T' result is shown t' t' left. Aye aye! As I'm backpedallin' back from t' pad after ascertainin' that t' fuse had burnt t' t' 13 second mark, matey, t' Estes E wastes no time into comin' t' life. Ahoy! Blimey! T' rocket wobbled some on t' way up-maybe because o' a high polar moment o' inertia/smallish fins (dumbbell effect owin' t' motors on both ends)-but skyward she went with some anticipated weathercockin' (another reason I weenied a bit on t' delay). Avast! Avast! T' booster/fincan separated just beyond apogee, me bucko, arrr, and t' heart stoppin' plunge towards Terra Firma began in earnest.

At about 300-400 feet up, me heart resumes beatin' when t' nose motor kicks in and saves t' Backdraft from certain death. Blimey! That it "overshoots" a bit and does a brief mid-air thrash is easily forgiven. Avast! Few seconds later, ya bilge rat, we have t' welcome sight shown in Photo 11!

Only one small fly in t' ointment-the yellow nose which should be danglin' along side t' rocket is nowhere t' be seen. T' clue as t' why is here in this review, winners receive a years free subscription t' Rocketry Planet.

Discussion:

I suspect that this rocket might generate some controversy. I know it raised differences o' opinion among t' Rocketry Planet moderators who act as RSO's.

Photo 11: Success, we have recovery!

Is this rocket sufficiently safe t' fly? In tryin' t' answer this, ya bilge rat, ya bilge rat, I looked at all t' relevant safety codes and could find no reason t' disqualify t' rocket. Maybe on account o' t' fact I'm an old-timer, who has used real honest t' God mercury switch/capacitor fired/flashbulb cannon fuse for airstartin' BP motors, and seen it work, I wasn't as skeptical as some. Ya scallywag! Begad! No I have never flown a retro rocket before, but in t' end, arrr, ya bilge rat, matey, t' relevant question is: does this rocket present that much greater a hazard than others we fly?

Bottom line, shiver me timbers, I say, no. Well, blow me down! Blimey! Sure it would be great and likely safer t' electronically perform t' same task. No different than deployin' t' main at 500', shiver me timbers, one should at least be able t' ignite t' retro at x altitude, ya bilge rat, or ideally x feet per second. Ahoy! Blimey! But this is about addin' a new twist t' mid-power fliers who cannot or choose nay t' splurge for electronics. Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! I would treat this rocket just as C.R.A.S.H. Begad! Blimey! Ya scallywag! Blimey! did-a heads-up flight, arrr, shiver me timbers, with an additional element o' fire risk.

As packaged, arrr, I'd say it makes t' short list o' all t' under-F powered kits that truly were in one sense or another, revolutionary. If I had t' prune that list t' say six, they would include t' Estes Astron Spaceplane (boostglider), shiver me timbers, t' Estes Gyroc (helicopter recovery), t' Centuri Hustler/Lil Hustler (designed for BP F engines), t' first multiengined rocket/s (not certain these are right - Estes Apogee (staged) and Ranger(cluster)), t' AeroTech Phoenix R/C rocket glider, and t' Backdraft. Arrr! Thats pretty select company.

I picked those because each o' these rockets opened up a new vista in sport rocketry, and yet none were particularly aesthetically appealin' rockets. Begad! Aye aye! T' Backdraft fits this bill entirely. Avast! It's certainly nay about t' turn heads sittin' near your field box, in fact it's a tad homely. Avast! Arrr! But as t' rocket barrels in destined for certain destruction, just then, t' nose motor kicks in, gracefully brakin' t' banshee-like descent, shiver me timbers, and a few seconds later, gently floatin' under chute, she will most definitely turn heads when flown. Arrr! Begad! One can immediately think o' all kinds o' interestin' competitions based on t' concept, me hearties, and roamin' into t' domain o' high power and extreme rocketry, maybe some applications thar as well.

I strongly recommend t' kit based on high KEWL factor, innovation, and overall quality. Avast! And a definite strong thumbs up goes t' Jose Andrade-Cora, arrr, t' designer and proprietor o' Heavenly Hobbies.

Retro Rocket/Backdraft Background:

Jose provided me with a memo he had written previously about t' inspiration and development o' t' Backdraft:

Back in 2002, as our family vacation loomed near, me hearties, arrr, ya bilge rat, I placed an order for some NARTS publications t' provide some relief from t' "packaged" distractions found in t' big Florida theme parks. Avast, me proud beauty! Among t' assorted reports and technical papers, thar was one that seriously caught me attention. Blimey! It be a NARAM-34 report by Bruce Markielewski about construction o' what he termed "retro-rockets". Ahoy! These models were rockets that bypassed ejection at apogee for a delayed deployment o' their recovery system. Avast! T' counteract t' gravity force durin' re-entry, a second engine was fired. This second engine would slow down t' rocket sufficiently for t' recovery system t' take over. Aye aye! I thought that "retro-rockets" were a great idea, shiver me timbers, as they added complexity and interest t' t' usual rocket flight patterns that, ya bilge rat, ya bilge rat, frankly, were gettin' old.

Markielewski's stated objective be t' "...design and build a reliable, me bucko, me bucko, functionin' model rocket usin' a 'retro-rocket' technique t' slow t' descent o' t' model rocket before deployin' a parachute or other recovery device." This objective, however interesting, matey, failed t' focus on t' possibility o' usin' t' "retro-rocket" concept t' reduce t' drift o' t' model from t' launchin' pad. Blimey! Common Dual Deployment™ techniques use electronic actuators t' force t' ejection o' a streamer or small "drogue" parachute t' cause a fast, me bucko, but controlled, descent. A larger parachute is subsequently deployed by similar means. T' idea is t' reduce t' time t' rocket is subject t' crosswind drag, therefore reducin' t' drift. Ya scallywag!

However, me bucko, a rocket usin' t' "retro" techniques does nay "break up" t' deploy a recovery device in its coastin' phase after apogee. Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! Ya scallywag! Blimey! It, me bucko, therefore, matey, presents a smaller frontal area t' crosswinds. Less frontal area means less drag and less drift. Arrr! Blimey! Also, me hearties, crosswinds actin' on parachutes create lift forces, ya bilge rat, arrr, so nay havin' a parachute in this phase o' t' descent also helps. Blimey! Blimey! Moreover, a compact rocket presents a much more aerodynamic profile in t' vertical direction, allowin' higher (more negative) terminal velocity limits. Arrr! Blimey! Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! This leads t' much reduced periods durin' which t' model rocket is subject t' crosswinds, and again, me hearties, less drift. Begad! Blimey! In simple words, arrr, t' "retro-rocket" technique is superior t' t' common Dual Deployment technique in reducin' crosswind drift.

To put Markielewski's work in perspective, shiver me timbers, one must realize that t' achieve his objectives, shiver me timbers, matey, me hearties, a fair amount o' mathematical calculations were required, shiver me timbers, perhaps too many or too intensive for t' average modeler. Ahoy! Aye aye! However, I realized right then and thar that t' limitations that were real in 1992 were no longer thar in 2004. Ahoy! T' personal computer had removed them from t' picture! In other words, ya bilge rat, I had found an alternative for Dual Deployment which, shiver me timbers, provided t' rocketeer had a computer at home, me bucko, ya bilge rat, didn't require expensive electronics or demandin' mathematical calculations, renderin' it attainable t' many more rocketeers. Begad! This was t' birth o' t' TailWind delayed-deployment system. Begad!

Soon after me vacation was over, I started workin' on t' first prototype for me version o' t' "retro-rocket". Ya scallywag! It be a single-stage, me bucko, me hearties, large diameter rocket with ducted ejection gases for aft ejection. Ya scallywag! Well, blow me down! That design never took t' t' skies. Blimey! T' me knowledge, t' available software was nay able t' model t' unusual shapes and flight paths that I was conceiving. I had realized that t' controllin' software was even more essential than t' rocket itself. Ya scallywag! Ya scallywag! My top priority then became t' develop t' software that would take t' place o' t' deployment electronics. Well, blow me down! T' software was essentially a simulation program, optimized for t' Backdraft model. Ya scallywag! It obviously had t' take into consideration gravity, thrust and drag, arrr, but it also had t' give due weight t' t' unusual changes in physical characteristics that would occur durin' flight. Aye aye! Begad! This work eventually became t' H.H. Arrr! Ya scallywag! Simit simulation software. Blimey!

H.H. Aye aye! Avast, me proud beauty! Simit (v1) is included in all new Backdraft kits. Blimey! Ahoy! It provides simulated altitude, velocity and acceleration information for t' model's flight. Aye aye! Well, blow me down! It also allows t' flyer t' easily choose primary and secondary engines (and their respective delays) usin' t' provided data. Avast! These choices are critical for t' safe flyin' o' t' model. Well, blow me down! Avast, me proud beauty! Future rocket or engine modifications will nay be a problem as t' information database is user-editable. Avast! You don't need t' buy a new version o' H.H. Arrr! Begad! Simit t' fly a new version o' Backdraft or t' accommodate t' thrust characteristics o' a new engine! As development continues, H.H. Simit will be made available as a separate product.

Subsequent prototypes abandoned t' large-diameter airframe for a more energy-efficient BT-60 based design. T' final design offers a booster-style detachable propulsion module, shiver me timbers, straight-through ejection gas ductin' and EZject piston-actuated system for aft ejection. Begad! With t' EZject system, arrr, flameproof waddin' and / or parachute protectors are completely unnecessary, makin' field preparation a breeze! EZject is different from other piston-based ejection systems in that its simplicity and low manufacturin' cost makes it available t' all rocket designs, even t' most simple and basic (see t' Heavenly Hobbies' Stratos-13 ELM and Stratos-18 ELM models). Ahoy! Ahoy!

T' essential physical difference betwixt t' Backdraft and a common 2-stage rocket is that t' second-stage engine has exchanged places with t' recovery system. Arrr! Blimey! T' secondary engine been moved forward, behind t' nosecone, while t' parachute has moved back. Well, blow me down! Blimey! Ya scallywag! Blimey! Blimey! Blimey! This secondary engine has also been rotated 180°, so that t' nozzle points t' t' sky while t' rocket sits at t' launch pad. Ya scallywag! Blimey! As I said before, when lit, me bucko, this engine will provide thrust t' counteract t' force o' gravity and slow down t' rocket sufficiently, arrr, so that t' parachute can open without tearin' t' shreds. Aye aye! Blimey! Ahoy! Blimey! Blimey! Blimey! Since t' parachute can open as close t' t' ground as desired, matey, drift is reduced considerably. Ahoy! Blimey! Blimey! Blimey! T' reduction in drift allows t' hobbyist t' fly higher and/or in windier conditions. Aye aye! Blimey! This be t' magic o' t' TailWind delayed deployment system. Well, blow me down! Blimey! Blimey! Blimey!

Since t' secondary engine is far removed from t' primary engine, me hearties, t' primary engine cannot be used t' directly ignite t' secondary one. This problem would normally be remedied with an electronic timer or other similar artifact. However, ya bilge rat, me hearties, me hearties, it was a design objective for t' Backdraft t' "kick it old school" and avoid any electronic control artifacts inside t' rocket. Ahoy! As a result, matey, a good old visco fuse ("cannon fuse") is used t' delay t' firin' o' t' secondary engine. Aye aye! This fuse is lighted at t' same time as t' igniter for t' secondary engine, so a good 12-volt launch system is needed. Arrr! You also need t' time your fuse accurately, so a stopwatch will come in handy also.

It is critical t' follow t' instructions in buildin' and flyin' this model. Ahoy! I have gone through several prototypes in perfectin' a safe and reliable flyin' procedure, so you don't have to! Use H.H. Arrr! Simit t' your advantage, and remember t' allow yourself a margin o' error in your calculations. Arrr!

Happy flying!

Jose M. Blimey! Andrade-Cora
Heavenly Hobbies LLC

Now in fairness, this idea goes back at least as far as t' 1970's when it was discussed in a rocketry magazine article. Ahoy! T' first large public launch was at NARAM 1992, where Bruce M. Aye aye! staged a test flight in conjunction with his R/D report. Well, blow me down! Many have tried more or less t' same approach with varyin' degrees o' success both before and since, but never t' me knowledge with quite this level o' sophistication, and certainly nay in a kit with integrated software.

It was somethin' o' an honor for me t' fly this at a C.R.A.S.H. launch. Avast, ya bilge rat, me proud beauty! Blimey! After all, this be Bruce M.'s old club and launch site. Arrr! Blimey! Sadly, Bruce passes a few years back. Aye aye! Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! His legacy certainly lives on, and t' Backdraft a fittin' piece o' such. I am sure Bruce smiled from beyond t' Saturday me Backdraft flight took place.