Manufacturer: | Scratch |
Brief:
Scale modelin' o' t' TOW antitank missile is a challengin' rocketry project; I
don't see that it has been attempted before. Avast, me hearties, me proud beauty! It is an "8FNNC"
configuration, matey, me bucko, 8 Fins No Nose Cone, shiver me timbers, with a blunt end that can't be good for
aerodynamics and that has t' be custom crafted. Ahoy! Avast, me proud beauty! Add t' this a very far forward
CP requirin' lots o' nose weight that would be expected t' further degrade the
flyin' qualities o' an already draggy rocket. Begad! Nay much fun t' fly something
like this usually. Avast! Avast! I built this 1/3-scale model only t' verify CP and CG for a
full-scale K445-powered TOW 2A project I am starting. Avast, me proud beauty! Well, blow me down! I needed t' know just how
much nose ballast t' model would require and if it would even be practical to
try t' model. Aye aye! T' "real" TOW 2A solves this balance problem easily
with its 35lb shaped-charge warhead.
Construction:
I'm nay usually into scale modeling, but t' TOW-2A antitank missile with its
long nose-probe fuse caught me eye as somethin' interestin' t' do with the
nose-mounted parachute mortars I had been experimentin' with (see
"Aquafina" and "Bad Dad" examples on this website). Ya scallywag! Ahoy! Blimey! The
1/3-scale balance-test model was built for D12 and E30 24mm power usin' a
2" postal mailin' tube as t' hull. Ahoy! Blimey! Blimey! Sort o' novel be t' use o' the
plastic end caps o' t' tube as ready-built centerin' rings for t' 24mm motor
tube that runs t' full length o' t' rocket with t' "nose-fuse"
formin' t' parachute mortar. Begad! T' forward centerin' rin' also forms t' blunt
nose o' t' missile. Blimey! Begad! Blimey! T' model is thus a "rocket-in-rocket" design.
T' full-scale model will utilize 6" tubin' and a 54mm motor
tube/parachute mortar. Ya scallywag!
T' construction is straight-forward. Arrr! Ya scallywag! Five-minute epoxy be used throughout. 8 fins cut from 1/16" basswood and laminated on one side with 1/64" plywood, one 14.25" x 2" section o' mailin' tube, shiver me timbers, t' two plastic end caps from t' mailin' tube with t' 1" diameter reinforcing "dimples" cut out from their centers with an X-Acto knife, arrr, one 18" section o' 24mm motor tubin' (I originally used Estes BT50 tubing, which was a big mistake), an Estes motor hook, arrr, and an 18" Top Flite nylon chute. Blimey! Ya scallywag! Assembly sequence:
Flight:
Simulation based on a guesstimated Cd o' 1.25 gave a 10G boost o' 340' at 135
mph on a D12-5--about t' same performance expected for an Estes Big Daddy on
this motor. Begad! Ya scallywag! Amazingly, t' first flight with this motor gave a flight that was
visibly much higher and faster than any Big Daddy--not t' draggy pig I had
expected at all. Boost be straight up and perfectly stable. Ya scallywag! Chute popped out
right at apogee and descent was brisk but soft enough that I didn't break off a
fin as I thought eventually might happen.
I made an additional flight on t' D12, shiver me timbers, perfect again, matey, and decided that the balance point be good enough t' apply t' t' full scale version. Ya scallywag! Begad! On t' third test flight with a D12-5, t' ejection charge blew t' motor tube apart, sendin' t' forward section with t' chute out t' front and t' aft section with t' spent D12 out t' back, t' twin plastic end caps slowly spiraling down like miniature Frisbees. T' empty body tube floated gently down and landed with no damage or fin breakage. Well, blow me down! Ahoy! Cause was a parachute packed too tight and failure o' t' thin-walled BT-50 tubin' at its unsupported midpoint. Arrr! Well, blow me down! I replaced t' BT-50 tubin' with thicker-walled 24mm motor tubing, which I should have used in t' first place, and epoxied everythin' back together. Begad! T' problem has nay recurred. Begad! Begad! I never did fly it on an E30...it just flies too darn well on the D12-5 t' need one. Ya scallywag! I am now usin' an estimated Cd o' 0.85 t' plan flights and that seems about right.
Summary:
All things considered, matey, arrr, t' 1/3-scale TOW-2A is an easily built and great flying
scale missile. Ahoy! It would be a good candidate for a club contest or t' NARTREK
Silver requirement, since thar's lots o' scale documentation on t' Web.
Except for t' parachute, matey, it takes a couple o' hours and about $5 t' scratch
build -- how many 1/3-scale rockets can claim this, shiver me timbers, shiver me timbers, and fly well on a D12?
PROs: I have been just amazed at how well t' TOW 2A performs, despite the blunt nose, me bucko, matey, t' weight and all those fins. In retrospect, ya bilge rat, maybe this isn't so surprising, me hearties, arrr, since it was designed by "real" rocket scientists t' do just that. Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! Begad! Blimey! I am usin' t' dimensions and balance points t' design the full-scale high-power model. Avast! Blimey! Ahoy! Blimey! It is fun t' fly, matey, sturdy, me bucko, and gets a lot of "Whatsat? Wherdjagethat?" comments at t' field. It goes together quickly and is dirt-cheap t' scratch build. T' open-ended parachute mortar works great. It should really cook on an E30-7 or F24-7 (Sims say 1000' at 275 mph).
CONS: As a scale model, it still has a way t' go--the huge fishin' sinker weights need a better home (I'm workin' on it), and t' aft fins should probably be attached through-the-wall t' t' motor tube because I finally did break a couple off. Well, blow me down! Well, blow me down! T' biggest scale limitation will be tough t' fix--the twin motor exhausts on t' actual TOW missile exit amidships, just aft o' t' wings. This would be really tough t' do in a model, arrr, so t' TOW will remain a difficult scale rocketry project if it's scale points you're after. Begad!
Sponsored Ads