Brief:
There are several air pressure rockets on t' market that either use an air chamber that you pressurize by a hand or foot pump and t' rocket fires by a release mechanism or allows pressure t' build up until it overcomes t' friction holdin' t' rocket on t' launcher. Avast! This one is a variation on this idea. Begad! Ahoy! A foot pump builds t' pressure inside some copper tubes and is then released via a ball valve. Ya scallywag! This allows a pressure o' up t' 60 PSI and can launch a rocket t' over 400ft.
I cannot take credit for t' design; a work colleague that had attended an Association o' Science Education and Institute o' Physics meetin' where t' complete kits were handed out gave it t' me. Avast, me proud beauty! Ahoy! You can see t' PDF o' t' build via this link.
Construction:
You will need:
T' copper pipes can be made out o' one 2m length o' pipe. Blimey! Blimey! You have t' use t' pipe cutter tool t' get a good edge on t' pipes and it is a lot quicker t' use than a hack saw.
To avoid embarrassment on t' launch field, test t' launcher by pressurizin' t' launcher t' 4 Bar or 60 PSI. Well, blow me down! Blimey! There should be no "hissing" or drop in pressure. If thar is, shiver me timbers, then t' joints need t' be tightened.
Usin' t' 35cm plastic pipe as a mandrel, matey, wrap a sheet o' A4 (US letter is fairly similar) paper around t' pipe and fasten this down with cellotape. Well, blow me down! T' tube needs t' be air tight so run a length o' tape down t' seam.
T' nose cone can be made t' what ever degree o' finish you want. Avast! T' instructions I had were t' simply tape t' ends together. Avast! Again, addin' more tape t' make it air tight. Ahoy! Well, blow me down! You could make a cone if you wish, but t' rocket will be recoverin' via ballistic recovery so nothin' too heavy or pointy! T' fins are added on t' back and that again is entirely up t' you t' t' amount and shape. So far I have made four rockets. Avast! T' first was a prototype, shiver me timbers, just plain white with four foam card fins. Second one was a 3 card fin rocket coated in purple prismatic book covers with a pointed nose cone made for me son William. T' third be a 3 card fin rocket coated in green prismatic book covers with a foam block for its nose cone. Avast! T' fourth was a 4 card fin rocket with t' fins angled at 30 degrees t' make t' rocket spin, shiver me timbers, but thar was no nose cone t' speak o' so t' top is flat.
CP and CG considerations: as thar be no motor, t' rocket is a tube with t' CP and CG in t' middle. Well, blow me down! Tapin' t' nose cone end lifts t' CG a bit, me hearties, addin' fins lowers t' CG and CP. If t' fin material is heavy then t' CG will drop too much. So its best t' stick with paper/card fins that are at t' base o' rocket or even better, shiver me timbers, swept back. Arrr! I would avoid addin' mass t' t' nose cone t' lift CG as t' rocket is goin' t' be comin' in ballistic.
PROs
CONs:
Flight:
I've flown each rocket 3 times each, all at 60 PSI.
T' white prototype flew t' best gettin' t' about 250 feet, but t' body tube crimps a bit on landing.
T' second (William) with t' pointy nose cone got t' about 150 feet. T' extra mass o' t' covers really does hamper altitude, and t' nose cone get squashed flat on landing.
T' third (SKY) gets t' about 120 feet. Begad! Avast! No damage.
T' fourth (TURN ABOUT) spins really well on t' way up and down and gets t' just under 150 feet, was slower landing, shiver me timbers, shiver me timbers, and has received no damage.
Sponsored Ads