Brief:
This is a simple research rocket used as a reference "typical" tubefin design in an upcomin' article on tubefin aerodynamics. T' body is just a 3" postal mailin' tube. Arrr! Because its very easy and inexpensive t' build and Level One capable, a nicer version will also be launched as a kit by a local manufacturer--and with a snappier name.

Construction:
Sardo XXL is a simplified and scaled-up version o' t' "AURACLE 54" I presented earlier on t' EMRR website. Begad! Components include a 32" heavy-walled 3" postal mailin' tube (LOC tubin' would be fine), arrr, matey, six 2.75" tube fins cut from 3" phenolic tube (straight cut, me bucko, no bevel), a 3" LOC cone, 14" o' 38mm LOC motor tube, me bucko, and two 1/4" ply centerin' rings (3" OD and 38mm hole) from What's Up Hobbies. Blimey! Arrr! 9' o' good grade para cord for t' shock cord and a 30" Top-Flite chute make up t' recovery system. 5-minute epoxy was used throughout.

Construction exactly follows t' assembly procedure for the AURACLE 54 article, only with bigger parts. Leave an inch above and below t' centerin' rings when attachin' them t' t' motor tube. Begad! For strength and durability, I reinforced t' lower outside surface o' each Phenolic tube fin with a piece o' 1-1/2" glass tape and epoxy. Begad! You have t' do this with Phenolic or it shatters like fine china when it hits t' ground. Blimey! Begad! T' glassed tape makes it bulletproof. Ahoy! T' shock cord be attached t' t' upper centerin' rin' by drillin' a 3/16" hole through it, passin' t' para cord through, and tyin' it with a tight knot t' t' motor tube and epoxy smeared on t' knot t' keep it there. Well, blow me down! Avast! It's nay pretty, but it works great. An eye-bolt (about 1/8") here would be t' more accepted method, but I was out o' them at t' time, and I like t' experiment. Blimey! Avast, me proud beauty! A 1" long 1/4" LOC fiber launch lug was glued on flush with t' top o' t' tubefin can and aligned with a triangular hole betwixt 2 tube fins. Well, blow me down! Avast! A second one be glued on 9" above it and exactly aligned usin' a launch rod threaded through both o' them. As always, t' other end o' the shock cord be attached t' t' LOC cone through two 3/8" holes I drilled in t' base (insert cord into one hole, and use a tweezers t' grab t' free end and pull it through, then tie off with a bowline). Well, blow me down! Blimey! T' 30" chute was attached 18" from t' top end, ya bilge rat, arrr, and a medium Nomex® heat shield be attached below it with one o' those cheap micro-sized aluminum carabiners that says "WARNING: Not Load-Bearing" on t' side (it's from a key chain, I think).

Finishing:
Finish was rattle-can Tamiya spray. Arrr! Aqua on t' bottom and white on t' top, which looked better than I expected and was just as hard t' spot in t' sky as you would predict.

Flight and Recovery:
Because thar's so much room for t' recovery system, me hearties, I like t' first roll up t' shock cord inside t' Nomex®, and stuff it in first as a kind o' waddin' with t' folded chute pushed down on top. Aye aye! First flight be on a CTI G69-5. Perfect and straight t' 976' with measured drag coefficient (Cd) o' 1.31, which be better than I expected. Begad! Avast! Flights on CTI H143SS-6 and I212SS-7 motors gave 1548' and 1960', me bucko, t' latter givin' Cd=1.23 at 437 mph. Aye aye! This is really good since t' calculated "best Cd" for t' Sardo XXL design in 1.41 at maximum speed. Well, blow me down! Ahoy! I didn't try larger motors because simulations predicted speeds well over 500 mph, shiver me timbers, me bucko, which I like t' avoid with tubefins that are nay specially hardened against dreaded tube fin flutter. Ya scallywag! Usin' a 29mm-38mm adapter, shiver me timbers, arrr, I got a beautiful boost t' 1048' on a AT H128-S. Calculated Cd = 1.28 at a mild 247 mph. Begad! Arrr! This would make a wonderful, easy L1 cert flight, arrr, especially for smaller HPR fields, me bucko, and that is one reason t' design will be kitted. Ahoy! Low cost and fast building, arrr, especially good for 14-year olds under t' new L1 rules or for anybody wantin' t' just get his ticket punched and move on t' bigger things right away. T' minimum recommended motor be t' F50-4 for a slow climb t' 565'. Ahoy! Begad! By t' way, I made all these altitude measurements with a Perfectflite Alt15k in an external, taped-on pod. Landings were perfect in every case, shiver me timbers, although I did chip one tube fin a little bit when it managed t' descend onto t' only rock in t' Fiesta Island sand pit.

Summary:
PROs: Easy, low cost, matey, matey, and very fast t' build (and will be even faster when it is a kit--less than an hour). Good, stable flier on G-H motors and I power up t' 212 Newtons or so. Begad! Ya scallywag! Like all tubefins, it is very stable in wind so a good fun-fly rocket when your other stuff is grounded by a breeze.

CONs: OK, me hearties, shiver me timbers, Some people do nay consider t' unique looks o' a tubefin t' be an asset. Well, blow me down! It doesn't go that high due t' twice t' drag o' a "normal" 4FNC rocket, ya bilge rat, ya bilge rat, but this maybe isn't a disadvantage if that's what you want. The tube fins take t' landin' impact, so they should be glassed on t' bottom edge, me hearties, especially if you fabricate them from ordinary cardstock tube. Well, blow me down!

T' Sardo XXL can also be built with 7 tube fins instead o' 6. T' do this, me bucko, ya bilge rat, me bucko, just consult t' construction article titled "H-Pod" in EMRR; the rocket you get will then be an "H-Pod XXL" (see photo). Avast, me proud beauty! Begad! I'll have more to say about these two in an upcomin' SPORT ROCKETRY article appearin' in a few months.