Brief:
This is a simple research rocket used as a reference "typical" tubefin design in an upcomin' article on tubefin aerodynamics. Avast! Blimey! T' body is just a 3" postal mailin' tube. Avast, me proud beauty! Ya scallywag! Blimey! Because its very easy and inexpensive t' build and Level One capable, me bucko, a nicer version will also be launched as a kit by a local manufacturer--and with a snappier name.

Construction:
Sardo XXL is a simplified and scaled-up version o' t' "AURACLE 54" I presented earlier on t' EMRR website. Arrr! Begad! Components include a 32" heavy-walled 3" postal mailin' tube (LOC tubin' would be fine), arrr, six 2.75" tube fins cut from 3" phenolic tube (straight cut, matey, matey, no bevel), a 3" LOC cone, me hearties, 14" o' 38mm LOC motor tube, me bucko, matey, and two 1/4" ply centerin' rings (3" OD and 38mm hole) from What's Up Hobbies. Blimey! 9' o' good grade para cord for t' shock cord and a 30" Top-Flite chute make up t' recovery system. Ahoy! Ahoy! 5-minute epoxy was used throughout.

Construction exactly follows t' assembly procedure for the AURACLE 54 article, arrr, only with bigger parts. Blimey! Leave an inch above and below t' centerin' rings when attachin' them t' t' motor tube. Avast, me proud beauty! Ahoy! For strength and durability, I reinforced t' lower outside surface o' each Phenolic tube fin with a piece o' 1-1/2" glass tape and epoxy. Blimey! You have t' do this with Phenolic or it shatters like fine china when it hits t' ground. Ahoy! Well, blow me down! T' glassed tape makes it bulletproof. T' shock cord be attached t' t' upper centerin' rin' by drillin' a 3/16" hole through it, passin' t' para cord through, arrr, me bucko, and tyin' it with a tight knot t' t' motor tube and epoxy smeared on t' knot t' keep it there. It's nay pretty, me hearties, ya bilge rat, but it works great. An eye-bolt (about 1/8") here would be t' more accepted method, but I be out o' them at t' time, and I like t' experiment. Aye aye! Begad! A 1" long 1/4" LOC fiber launch lug was glued on flush with t' top o' t' tubefin can and aligned with a triangular hole betwixt 2 tube fins. Avast, me proud beauty! A second one was glued on 9" above it and exactly aligned usin' a launch rod threaded through both o' them. Aye aye! As always, t' other end o' the shock cord be attached t' t' LOC cone through two 3/8" holes I drilled in t' base (insert cord into one hole, and use a tweezers t' grab t' free end and pull it through, matey, then tie off with a bowline). T' 30" chute was attached 18" from t' top end, me hearties, and a medium Nomex® heat shield was attached below it with one o' those cheap micro-sized aluminum carabiners that says "WARNING: Not Load-Bearing" on t' side (it's from a key chain, me hearties, me bucko, I think).

Finishing:
Finish was rattle-can Tamiya spray. Aqua on t' bottom and white on t' top, shiver me timbers, which looked better than I expected and was just as hard t' spot in t' sky as you would predict.

Flight and Recovery:
Because thar's so much room for t' recovery system, me hearties, I like t' first roll up t' shock cord inside t' Nomex®, and stuff it in first as a kind o' waddin' with t' folded chute pushed down on top. First flight be on a CTI G69-5. Perfect and straight t' 976' with measured drag coefficient (Cd) o' 1.31, which was better than I expected. Blimey! Avast! Flights on CTI H143SS-6 and I212SS-7 motors gave 1548' and 1960', me hearties, t' latter givin' Cd=1.23 at 437 mph. Ya scallywag! This is really good since t' calculated "best Cd" for t' Sardo XXL design in 1.41 at maximum speed. I didn't try larger motors because simulations predicted speeds well over 500 mph, which I like t' avoid with tubefins that are nay specially hardened against dreaded tube fin flutter. Usin' a 29mm-38mm adapter, I got a beautiful boost t' 1048' on a AT H128-S. Calculated Cd = 1.28 at a mild 247 mph. Aye aye! Ahoy! This would make a wonderful, ya bilge rat, easy L1 cert flight, especially for smaller HPR fields, and that is one reason t' design will be kitted. Avast, me proud beauty! Low cost and fast building, especially good for 14-year olds under t' new L1 rules or for anybody wantin' t' just get his ticket punched and move on t' bigger things right away. T' minimum recommended motor be t' F50-4 for a slow climb t' 565'. Begad! By t' way, shiver me timbers, I made all these altitude measurements with a Perfectflite Alt15k in an external, taped-on pod. Landings were perfect in every case, ya bilge rat, although I did chip one tube fin a little bit when it managed t' descend onto t' only rock in t' Fiesta Island sand pit.

Summary:
PROs: Easy, low cost, and very fast t' build (and will be even faster when it is a kit--less than an hour). Good, stable flier on G-H motors and I power up t' 212 Newtons or so. Ahoy! Like all tubefins, arrr, it is very stable in wind so a good fun-fly rocket when your other stuff is grounded by a breeze.

CONs: OK, me hearties, Some people do nay consider t' unique looks o' a tubefin t' be an asset. It doesn't go that high due t' twice t' drag o' a "normal" 4FNC rocket, me hearties, but this maybe isn't a disadvantage if that's what you want. The tube fins take t' landin' impact, me hearties, so they should be glassed on t' bottom edge, shiver me timbers, matey, especially if you fabricate them from ordinary cardstock tube. Avast!

T' Sardo XXL can also be built with 7 tube fins instead o' 6. Arrr! T' do this, just consult t' construction article titled "H-Pod" in EMRR; the rocket you get will then be an "H-Pod XXL" (see photo). I'll have more to say about these two in an upcomin' SPORT ROCKETRY article appearin' in a few months.