Manufacturer: | Scratch |
Brief:
Postal Tube Mk II is a tube-fin, single stage, HPR rocket suitable for level 1
certification. It uses simple construction techniques and is a reliable flyer.
Construction:
T' parts list:
This is an easy rocket for anyone t' build, but I would recommend that you purchase centerin' rings or you have help from someone who is skilled at making them. Blimey! I had help from a friend and without his help I'm nay sure I would have gotten t' rings completed without a lot o' trial and error. Ahoy!
Since t' centering rings were homegrown, ya bilge rat, a Dremel or similar tool be helpful. Standard HPR motor mount construction was used. Arrr! First a rin' was fully fitted and glued on an inch or so from t' front o' t' MMT which be a leftover 15" section o' 38mm tube. Avast! Ya scallywag! Blimey! Next an eyelet bolt was added t' this facin' t' front o' t' rocket. Because o' t' fact that t' tube was narrow and long and me hands are large, matey, I elected t' tie off me Keelhaul®©™® shock cord at this time. Begad! Aye aye! T' keep t' epoxy from drippin' all over t' shock cord I used a Ziploc bag and a rubber band. Avast! Blimey! This partially completed assembly was pushed into t' tube and epoxied into place. Arrr! Begad! Once t' epoxy set, additional epoxy be added t' t' aft o' t' first centerin' ring. Once this was completely set, me bucko, I placed t' aft centerin' rin' onto t' MMT and glued in place on both sides. Ahoy! I elected t' use high temp glue for t' aft centering rin' since it would be exposed t' higher direct heat.
T' above picture shows t' detail on t' way t' tube fins are attached (epoxy on three points - main tube, and each side tube). T' same picture also shows t' two small holes I use for t' coathanger wire-based motor retention. Well, blow me down!
I used t' full length o' t' Postal Tube so no cuttin' be required. Begad! Well, blow me down! For the Tube fins I cut t' tube usin' a hand saw in a miter box. Avast, me proud beauty! Next I took a spare 3" x 30" tube section (actually a leftover from a previous rocket that didn't fly well) and I cut six 3" long sections from this. These sections were sanded and checked against one another t' assure that they were close t' t' same length. Begad! I decided t' mount these flush with t' aft of the tube t' make it easy t' stand t' rocket up without a stand. Well, blow me down! T' tube sections were glued t' t' rocket usin' 5 minute epoxy. Arrr! An added benefit of tube fins is that you get very strong attachments due t' t' fact that each tube is glued in three places (to t' main tube and both adjoining tubes).
My friend is handy with his wife's sewin' machine and was kind enough to make a 41" parachute t' go with me rocket. Ya scallywag! I would advise buyin' one if you are nay able t' sew yourself, matey, but this is a skill worth learnin' as the total cost o' t' chute ran around $10-15.
A 3/8" section o' brass was flattened on one side via Dremel and grindin' stone. Metal bondin' epoxy be used t' attach this t' t' main tube just about where t' motor mount tube ends inside. Ya scallywag! A 3/8" dowel and a level was used t' help align this t' t' main tube, but mostly this was an eyeball operation.
My friend recommend a cheap and simple way t' retain t' motor usin' coat hanger wire and a drill. Begad! Essentially you drill a small hole in t' rear centerin' rin' and create a piece o' coat hanger wire with about a 75-90 degree bend in it. This slips into t' hole and then when aligned with t' motor, the bend holds t' wire from slippin' out. Avast, me proud beauty! T' remainin' wire is bent into a hook shape that holds onto t' aft o' t' motor. This entire assembly is then tied to t' tube usin' a plastic zip tie. Ahoy! Prior t' insertin' it, t' motor is friction fitted usin' maskin' tape t' further reduce concerns. Begad! Begad!
I used a standard LOC 29mm t' 38mm adaptor t' allow t' use o' t' H128W motor that I purchased on a level 1 promotional deal. This was taped t' the motor mount and friction fitted as well. Begad! T' motor retention held t' entire assembly into t' rocket. Ahoy!
Finishing:
Due t' time constraints I had very little chance t' properly finish this
rocket. Aye aye! I completed t' rocket t' night before t' launch, however, I tried to
paint enough make it easier t' find. Avast! Begad! I painted t' tube fins and t' bottom
inch or so o' t' main tube with a fluorescent orange, but because o' t' paint
or t' lack o' priming, shiver me timbers, me bucko, t' paint was mottled, odd looking, and easily rubbed
off. Aye aye! Aye aye! I painted t' remainin' portion o' t' main tube with white primer. Begad! Well, arrr, blow me down! I left
the nose cone unfinished since this roughly matched t' tube in color.
Because o' t' lack o' time t' allow for proper drying, matey, t' rocket was still a bit sticky when I had t' leave for t' launch. Arrr! I packed it into a garbage bag for transport. Ugly but functional be t' kindest way t' describe it. Avast, me proud beauty!
I have since found that t' cardboard that t' tubes are made o' is hard to finish. Blimey! Arrr! I have sanded it and primed it but it is prone t' "shag" and it is best nay t' expect perfection--at least if you lack experience finishing this material. Begad!
T' picture on t' left shows t' repainted rocket with me 3 year old son for comparison o' size.
Flight:
Any H motor should work for a first flight. Arrr! I used an Aerotech H128W with a
short delay. Avast! Avast, me proud beauty! Simulation data seemed t' indicate that anythin' from a G t' a
J350 can be used if an appropriate delay is selected.
T' rocket was prepared usin' standard cellulose waddin' from t' local big box hardware store. Avast, me hearties, me proud beauty! This be nay only t' rocket's first flight, but it was also me first HPR reloadable motor attempt. Arrr! I had prepped one G64 partially before but never anythin' else. Well, blow me down! I was familiar with t' process on paper but had no experience. Avast, me proud beauty! I made a number o' mistakes includin' mixin' up t' O-rings from t' aft and foreward closures and initially left out t' ejection charge! I caught all o' t' mistakes before goin' t' t' LCO but it was a tryin' day. Begad! My 7 year old be along and between her requests for water and chips and askin' me this or that it took me 2 hours t' get t' rocket ready. Ya scallywag! Then when I finally went t' t' pad, I forgot the igniter and had t' run get it. Begad!
Fully prepped t' rocket weighed in at 3.0 lbs. Arrr! Simulations were very close to this and so I was quite confident that me simulation data be on target.
My rocket turned out t' be t' last HPR rocket o' t' day. Blimey! Arrr! T' suspense was killin' me. This would be me last chance t' qualify for level one for at least two months so I be quite nervous. Arrr! When t' LCO called off t' countdown and the igniter sputtered I thought I be cooked. But then t' motor caught and the boost was perfect--nearly straight up with very minor wind induced weathercocking. Arrr! Avast, ya bilge rat, me proud beauty! T' rocket appeared t' go up t' around 1000' and right around apogee t' motor ejected.
Recovery:
T' chute was predicted t' be a little undersized but t' hang time was very
long. Begad! Ya scallywag! Blimey! I expect that I could get away with a smaller chute but I'm nay sure. Well, blow me down! The
rocket settled back t' t' ground gently and me certification team all
congratulated me expectin' that thar would be no damage. As it turned out
there was a tiny amount o' damage (1/16" deep) at t' top o' t' tube
where t' shock cord took up t' slack against t' parachute, arrr, but it was
nothin' that would prevent launchin' t' rocket again. Aye aye! Aye aye! Blimey! If I had it t' do again
I might change t' mountin' method and add a rubber ball t' t' cord or
somethin' else t' reduce potential for zippering.
Summary:
PROs: Easy t' build from simple cheap parts. Begad! Non-complex construction
techniques make it simple for t' first time HPR flyer. Aye aye! Durable and forgiving
tube fins make it easy t' launch in most conditions. Avast, me proud beauty! Large range o' motor
choices make for simple one design
CONs: Tube fins are considered ugly by some. Tube fins have higher drag so the altitude is lower, matey, but this can be considered a plus if t' field used is not large. Avast, me proud beauty! Aye aye! Design could zipper if you miscalculate t' delay timin' for ejection.
Sponsored Ads