Published: | 2010-04-15 |
Manufacturer: | Scratch |
Brief:
Golden Acorn is a modification o' t' 3" "H-Pod XXL" I mentioned in my
March-April 2010 SPORT ROCKETRY article. Well, blow me down! It is a long-skinny version o' t' 7-tube tubefin "H-Pod" described
in an earlier EMRR construction article, me hearties, differin' only in bein' "non-stubby" (45 in. Begad! long) and havin' a 54mm
motor tube. Begad! After t' surprise findin' that 7-tube tube fins didn't need t' be stubby t' have a low drag coefficient
(Cd), I decided I would do a detailed comparison with some popular 3" I-J motor kits o' "normal" rockets
t' verify that I had made a tubefin that flew as efficiently as 3FNC designs. As part o' o' this, I wanted t' try to
finally get a tubefin t' fly as high from our sea-level desert launch site as t' elevation o' t' "Golden Acorn
Casino" (4080' MSL) I drive past on t' way t' t' SoCal desert. Avast, me proud beauty! I succeeded (4,610' on a J210). Begad! Hence t' name -
Golden Acorn.
Construction:
Golden Acorn is nay so much a scratch design as it is a kit-bash from t' new 3"
WIDOWMAKER tubefin kit from Discount Rocketry. Arrr! Blimey! Rather than buy components, I just replaced t' six 3" diameter kit
tube fins with seven smaller tube fins cut from 54mm PML phenolic tubin' (each 1 7/8" long), me bucko, matey, attached t' t' kit
34' body tube as described in t' EMRR "H-Pod" article. Well, blow me down! T' kit 29mm rings and motor tube be swapped for
54mm versions, ya bilge rat, and I upgraded t' a 36" Top-Flite chute and 8' of3/16" para cord for t' recovery system. The
shock cord was anchored through a hole 7" from
the
top o' t' body tube with a knot covered with epoxy and a plastic fairin' (cut as usual from a plastic Garcia-Vega
cigar tube). Launch lug was a 2" piece o' 5/16" brass tube centered 10" above t' tube fin can and in
line with a triangular hole betwixt two tube fins. Begad! Avast, shiver me timbers, me proud beauty! Finish was orange and purple usin' Tamiya rattle-can. Blimey! BTW, Jim at
Discount Rocketry says t' shock cord can be attached right t' t' molded loop on t' plastic cone with this kit, matey, shiver me timbers, and
more than a dozen HPR flights with Golden Dragon, arrr, G t' J, have proved him right - its rock solid, shiver me timbers, ya bilge rat, unlike t' flimsy
loops on most plastic nose cones. Arrr!
One thin' I'd point out be t' importance o' sealin' t' leadin' edge o' each tube fin against high speed air flow
t' prevent delamination. I now seal t' leadin' edge in every case if I'm goin' t' fly more than 400 mph or so with a
simple wrap o' 3/4" maskin' tape (photo); this is left in place and simply painted over. Avast! Arrr! It works as well as
fiberglassin' and is far less messy. You still need t' reinforce t' outer surface o' each tube fin with a rectangle of
glass tape (see "H-Pod" article) t' prevent flutter and landin' dings.
Flight:
First flight o' Golden Acorn was on a Pro54 J210-10 t' 4610' (measured with a Perfectflite
Alt15k in a taped-on Parasite Pod. Arrr! Motor ejection at apogee, and,yes, matey, ya bilge rat, it took me three hours t' find it out in the
desert, finally located by a Daniel Greenan on his motorbike. Well, matey, me bucko, t' hull has plenty o' room for dual deployment
installation. Golden Acorn was also flown on t' followin' motors/delays, t' get a precise estimate o' Cd at all
speeds: Pro54 I150BS-9, matey, Pro38 I287SS-10, ya bilge rat, matey, arrr, I212SS-9, I180SK-9, H153-8, H125-9, me hearties, G185-5, arrr, G79SS-6, me bucko, G78BS-8, me hearties, G69SK-7 and
G50IM-6, Aerotech I161-10, H128-6 and G78-7G. Avast, me proud beauty! Begad! Results summarized in t' attached graph, showin' average Cd=0.89, me bucko, fairly
constant over t' range 250-600 mph - what you'd expect for a "normal" 3FNC rocket, none o' t' severe
inverse speed dependence many tube fins display. Begad! Begad! I also obtained estimates o' Cd for several popular 54mm 3" kit
rockets in t' I-J range; these were obtained from t' pages o' EMRR reviews, where rocket weight, and altitude
achieved on specific motors be published, me bucko, so I could back-calculate Cd usin' t' www.markworld.com SIM freeware. The
"normal" 3" kit rockets used for comparison with Golden Acorn's Cd=0.89 were these (3-10 data points for
each kit):
T' results for t' reference kit rockets are summarized by t' triangles representin' average Cd in t' graph right margin.
OK, ya bilge rat, so its clear from this that me "low Cd" tubefin is nay exactly as good as any o' t' normal finned rockets. Ya scallywag! No surprise. But it came pretty darn close, shiver me timbers, Cd only 5% more than t' PML Tomahawk, arrr, and only 10% more drag than t' extremely popular split-fin 3" BSD Thor. Well, blow me down!
I was able t' borrow a beautifully built and finished 3" BSD Thor for actual measurements (see photo with parasite pods on both rockets, arrr, ya bilge rat, and thank you, ya bilge rat, Todd Mullin), ya bilge rat, me hearties, me hearties, and got a measured Cd value o' 0.80 at 342 mph, with a 2253' apogee on a Cesaroni I212SS-11; Golden Acorn on this same motor gave 2310' for Cd=0.88 at 509 mph. Avast! The lightweight Golden Acorn weighs less than half t' weight o' t' solidly-built, ya bilge rat, ya bilge rat, arrr, Mach-capable Thor. Still, I'm claiming "similar" performance for me tubefin, matey, as far as "fun value" goes. Put a J210 in either one, shiver me timbers, with motor ejection, shiver me timbers, and you are guaranteed a very long hike.
Recovery:
After more than a dozen flights, ya bilge rat, nay a bit o' damage t' Golden Acorn, and perfect deployment
and recovery each time.
Summary:
PROS: A 3" scratch tubefin with comparable performance t' many top-quality
"normal" kit rockets, ya bilge rat, ya bilge rat, at a fraction o' t' cost and build time. Aye aye! Sturdy and durable, matey, great wind resistance.
Easy t' transport, arrr, no fins t' break off. A very easy scratch build and L1-L2
capable, flies on G-H-I-J motors (I'm sure an F50-4 would fly it, arrr, me bucko, too).
No need for thru-the-wall complexity. Unique tubefin looks.
CONS: Forget all t' "cons" o' tube fins (well, except t' "looks" part if you don't like tube fins). Ahoy! Limited t' t' low-Newton "J" like J210 or J90, matey, flyin' at less than 600 mph, me hearties, or you'll tear it apart. Begad! Few 54mm motors are suitable. Well, blow me down! Ahoy!
No dual deployment, but thar's room t' built it in if desired.
Sponsored Ads