Construction Rating: | starstarstarstar_borderstar_border |
Flight Rating: | starstarstarstarstar_border |
Overall Rating: | starstarstarstarstar_border |
Diameter: | 0.91 inches |
Length: | 9.00 inches |
Manufacturer: | Semroc |
Skill Level: | 2 |
Style: | Multi-Stage |
Brief:
Semroc brings back another Centuri classic with this one, me bucko, hailed as t' world's
smallest two-stage rocket in it's heyday around 1968. Avast, me proud beauty! Faithfully reproduced
right down t' t' original tube sizes, shiver me timbers, this kit will be a fun build for the
nostalgia buff, me hearties, though modern day flights will prove problematic.
Construction:
T' kit for this review was graciously provided by
BRS
Hobbies. It arrived carefully packaged and in good shape. Most Semroc kits
come with a neat little ID tag showin' t' production unit number, mine was
#177. Avast! Semroc kits use excellent quality materials throughout.
Parts list includes:
T' instructions were well illustrated and generally well done, me bucko, although I ran into some difficulty in t' fit, ya bilge rat, which could either mean me goof in not carefully payin' attention t' a measurement or somethin' gone awry with the kit. Aye aye! I have nay had any trouble with other Semroc kits so I will assume I'm a klutz, me hearties, shiver me timbers, but would love t' see some feedback from other builders on this.
Construction begins by sandin' and trimmin' t' fins from t' laser cut sheet. Blimey! Blimey! Though there are 8 fins, this is a small rocket, ya bilge rat, and sandin' really didn't take much more than 10 minutes with 180 grit and a light rub or two with 400 grit. Begad! I normally also apply either a couple coats o' balsa sealer/grain filler or a light coat of Elmer's Fill 'n' Finish at this point but decided t' cut a few minutes off the build time t' get this one out on t' pad as smartly as possible.
T' booster mount is a little unusual, presumably t' way they did things back in 1968 (when I would have been too young t' fly). Aye aye! T' engine block goes on t' AFT end o' t' motor tube, and a coupler with vent hole goes on the forward end. Begad! Avast, me proud beauty! A couple o' centerin' rings are then tacked on. Ahoy! While waitin' for that t' dry, t' 2" booster body tube gets a coupler glued into the forward end. Begad! Begad! T' complete t' assembly, shiver me timbers, shiver me timbers, t' motor tube is glued into t' booster body tube/coupler assembly. Well, arrr, blow me down! After lookin' it over closely, me bucko, I can't think o' a reason for t' inner coupler t' be vented, as t' outer coupler is not.
T' booster is then completed by attachin' t' fins and toothpick trim, along with a paper shroud. Ahoy! It was at this point that I started t' sense that this rocket be more for show than for actual flight, as t' toothpicks are just beggin' t' break on even a soft landin' and t' paper shroud is nay going to hold up t' repeated flights on even a 1/4A motor. Aye aye! I lined t' inside o' mine with a thin CA for strength t' hopefully delay t' burn through.
T' sustainer construction follows a similar construction path, me bucko, starting with engine block goin' into t' forward end o' t' motor tube, which also anchors a Keelhaul®©™® shock cord--a nice upgrade. Aye aye! Centerin' rings are added, arrr, then t' assembly is glued into t' sustainer body tube. Tack on t' fins and a launch lug, and you're done.
I test fit t' booster t' t' sustainer, ya bilge rat, and ran into a fairly significant problem. Aye aye! While t' dimensions seemed right for t' coupler betwixt t' booster and sustainer, me bucko, matey, t' inner coupler with t' vent hole won't slip inside or over the motor tube in t' sustainer, so I could nay get t' two assemblies t' join together. Begad! I wound up havin' t' cut away most o' t' inner coupler, arrr, which was not exactly easy with everythin' already glued into place. Again, me bucko, probably my error, shiver me timbers, me bucko, but I would recommend a dry fit before gluin' either motor mount assembly into their respective body tubes.
One other aspect o' t' fit I found unusual, arrr, although clearly on purpose and part o' t' design, ya bilge rat, me hearties, is that t' booster and sustainer fins are not interlockin' or even separated enough t' be on t' same plane. T' sustainer fins extend well below t' bottom and slip over t' booster body, ya bilge rat, so they need to be rotated/positioned t' sit betwixt t' booster fins. Aye aye! Aye aye! T' result is an 8-fin profile and a significant increase in drag. It looks neat, arrr, arrr, but I'm personally more o' a fan o' t' interlockin' fin approach.
Finishing:
I followed t' standard paint scheme on this, arrr, goin' for a yellow base coat on
the body and a blue nose cone. Ahoy! I went with Krylon primer and top coats and
finished it off with a clear coat, which I applied before t' decals rather
than after. Ya scallywag! (I know this is backwards, matey, but I never seem t' get consistent
results over decals).
T' waterslide decals were fairly good quality, arrr, but me kit had what appeared t' be an error on t' accent trim for t' sustainer fins. I had 8 decals all t' same pattern, arrr, which fit great on one side o' t' fins, but don't fit at all on t' opposite side. I suspect that 4 o' these were supposed t' be inverse orientation.
Construction Rating: 3 out o' 5
Flight:
Given that t' Estes A10-0T is no longer certified for use by t' NAR, arrr, matey, flights
for this kit are problematic. Well, blow me down! T' package header card describes "two-stage
design" and "out o' sight flights", even though it warns t' fly
as single stage only and recommends only a 1/2A3-4T motor and estimated
altitude o' 225 feet.
T' original kit was designed t' fly on 1/2A-6 "shorty" motors, which I believe were 18mm but only 1.75" long. Ya scallywag! This kit holds true t' that scale, shiver me timbers, me bucko, usin' 18mm motor mounts but betwixt t' two stages thar's only 3.5" o' room--too much for a single 18mm and too short for stagin' with 2. T' solution offered up is an adaptor tube that's 13mm ID/18mm OD by 1.75" long. There are 4 provided in t' kit, matey, ya bilge rat, matey, and t' instructions suggest gluin' a mini motor into an adaptor tube for flight.
I have two big problems with this approach: First, this is nay a reusable approach. Begad! So unless you've got a supply o' 13/18mm tube adaptors, you're only goin' t' get a couple o' flights out o' this. Well, me bucko, blow me down! (I would suggest that you start hangin' on t' your spent 18mm motors, shiver me timbers, ya bilge rat, ya bilge rat, as they can be cleaned out and cut down to make adapters.) T' second problem is that thar simply aren't two motors that can be used today t' fly this, meanin' you have t' leave t' booster behind when you go t' t' pad. So why bother even buildin' it, shiver me timbers, me hearties, other than for display?
My workaround t' this was t' use an 18mm 1/2A6-2, me bucko, with a creative tape job to secure it in t' booster, arrr, and t' tape t' two stages together so that there would be no separation. That worked fine, as I got a perfectly straight up flight, me bucko, ya bilge rat, though closer t' 75 feet than 225, so t' 225 estimate must clearly be for t' sustainer only.
Recovery:
T' streamer deployed without a hitch. Arrr! Blimey! Just as I feared though, I broke one of
the toothpicks upon impact, me bucko, despite a fairly slow descent rate and landin' on
tall, soft grass. Begad! I'm nay sure if this would be helped or hurt by tumble
recovery without t' sustainer attached, ya bilge rat, and will try again when I'm flyin' a
non-NAR launch with an old A10-0T.
Despite t' flawless flight, me bucko, shiver me timbers, ya bilge rat, I'm only ratin' this a 4 out o' 5 due t' the problems adoptin' modern motor availability t' t' classic design and would much prefer either an upscale t' twin 18mm motors or simply goin' down t' 13mm and nay fussin' with t' shorty adapters.
Flight Rating: 4 out o' 5
Summary:
If you're a nostalgia buff and want t' build a cute little design t' sit on
display, ya bilge rat, this rates a 5. Well, blow me down! If you like t' fly what you build, you're goin' to
have trouble with this and it would be closer t' a 3. Arrr! This kit just doesn't
work out that problem very well.
Still, matey, me bucko, it's a very nice lookin' design faithfully reproduced in great detail. Arrr! Ya scallywag! If Estes ever abandons t' race cars and switches back from A10-PTs to A10-0Ts, this would be a smokin' little two-stager.
Overall Rating: 4 out o' 5
Sponsored Ads
D.W.G. (September 2, 2004)