Welcome to RocketReviews.com (formerly EMRR).
RocketReviews.com is the home of almost 5000 reviews of rocketry kits and products. Written by visitors to RocketReviews.com like you, the reviews cover everything from low-power model rocket kits to high-power rocket motors.
The site's Flight Log allows you to record and share your rockets and their flights. The Builds feature helps you document your rocketry projects.
At RocketReviews.com, you'll also find a large collection of rocketry resources such as a list of rocketry clubs, and large libraries of OpenRocket design files and Rocksim design files. A number of rocketry tools and calculators are available to help you design, build, and fly your rockets.
As you explore RocketReviews.com, you'll also find a number of fun things such as a huge library of rocketry videos and a collection of photo albums.
![]() |
![]() |
Manufacturer: Estes
Construction Rating:
Flight Rating:
Overall Rating:
Contributed by Greg Brown
Brief:
Single stage, parachute recovery with shock-absorbing landing gear.
Construction:
Upper BT-60 body tube of 5 11/16", lower BT-60 body tube of 2",
blow-molded ascent module, nose cone and engine nozzle, four legs made of
die-cut balsa, 1/8" dowels and foot pads, 18 inch parachute, 24 inch shock
cord, numerous die-cut cardboard centering rings, leg support struts, tank tops
and bottoms, four BT-50 tubes and eight BT-20 tubes for tanks, and generous
"decal" stickers.
The instructions are easy to follow and the illustrations clear for the careful modeler, but this is not a kit to be rushed. It perhaps should be rated higher than a skill level 3, as careful attention to detail is required, particularly to replicate the paint scheme on the card.
One "gotcha": The 2" wooden dowel that is glued to the motor mount is too long, and must be trimmed to allow the fore centering ring to settle in the right position. (The dowel seems designed to keep the holes in two of the rings lined up, and really isn't necessary at all if you simply use one of the leg dowels to line up the holes.)
To replicate the manufacturer's paint scheme, it is necessary to carefully follow the painting guide provided in the instructions. Painting is not left to the end of assembly, but rather takes place throughout the build. It is also important to mask the areas of various parts to which glue will be later applied.
A razor saw (or perhaps a fine-toothed hacksaw blade) will ensure clean cuts of the leg dowels and when separating the three parts from the ascent module/nose cone/engine nozzle unit.
The legs attach by running dowels through two centering rings on the motor mount, then attaching those dowels to the leg assembly dowels with a length of silicone hinge tube. The two wooden ends inside the tube are kept from rubbing together by small plastic "knee joint" balls.
Elastic cord attached to a small launch lug on each leg is held to the lower body tube when the engine nozzle is installed to provide shock absorption.
Finishing:
Finishing takes place throughout the construction process and care is
necessary. For the dark blue parts of the Outlander, I chose Model Master (by
Testor's) "Arctic Blue" spray paint and a matching bottle of the same
color to be brushed on the leg support struts and gear housing covers for a
perfect match. Legs and tanks are silver with the foot assemblies a bright red.
Decals (stickers, actually) are generous and add a great deal to the futuristic
look of the model.
Construction Rating: 4 out of 5
Flight:
Preparation involved a fair amount of "dog barf" wadding (it is a
BT-60 after all!) and motor retention is the familiar tried and true Estes
engine hook.
I can't imagine launching the Outlander on either of the recommended B motors. The C6-3 took it on a very straight flight to about 150 feet, and even with the short delay, ejection came a bit late. It did not land on all fours but tipped over without damage.
The second flight was on a Aerotech D21-4, with a flight about three times as high as the C motor. Again very straight with ejection at apogee but the Outlander was circling at the end of the 18" parachute and longer shock cord I had installed (standard three-part Estes mount), and even on a windless day did not "stick" the landing.
Recovery:
The recovery speed seemed about right. The rocket suffered no damage but it
failed to land on all fours. Perhaps I made the shock cord too long.
Flight Rating: 3 out of 5
Summary:
This is a beautiful futuristic kit that gets a lot of attention at the launch
site. Estes is to be congratulated for coming up with something so far removed
from the 3FNC designs that have dominated their catalog in recent years.
It's definitely way more "show" than "go," but as such makes an attention-getting small-field flyer that would be great for demonstration flying for a group of children. It's an excellent value at the full retail price of around $20, though it can be had for several dollars less.
Overall Rating: 4 out of 5
Browse our database of about 4,300 reviews of rocketry kits and other products.
Sponsored Ads
![]() |
![]() |